Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..' .. <br /> <br />7. Has the existing system ever experienced drain line problems associated with urine salts? <br />This problem is often referred to as plumbers stone, plumbers sugar and plumbers rock. <br />If this is a familiar problem, consider replacing existing cast iron, galvanized or copper <br />pipe with plastic piping at the effected area. Plastic is inherently less susceptible to build <br />up of urine salts. <br /> <br />MAINTENANCE <br />As with tank-type toilets, replacement of flushometer-type toilets and urinals may produce unique <br />maintenance requirements. Ask the manufacturer for the hydraulic performance data as required <br />by the ANSI standards to help in selecting a new model. Also, consider the following <br />maintenance criteria. <br /> <br />I. Find out what maintenance is required fo the flush valve to ensure proper performance. <br /> <br />2. If repair parts are needed, are they readily available "off shelf" or will they need to be <br />special ordered. Common repair parts include relief valves, molded discs, diaphragms <br />and vacuum breakers. <br /> <br />### <br /> <br />RETROFIT <br /> <br />CONSERVATION RETROFIT CONSIDERATIONS. MANY EXISTING TANK TYPE <br />TOILETS CAN AND SHOULD BE RETROFITTED WITH CURRENTLY A V AILABLE <br />WATER CONSERVATION RETROFIT DEVICES. (EXCEPT WHERE REMODELING OR <br />REPLACING EXISTING TOILETS.) THERE ARE, HOWEVER, SOME PROBLEMS <br />ASSOCIATED WITH THE RETROFIT OF EXISTING TOILETS. A DISCUSSION OF THE <br />PROBLEMS AND THE APPLICABLE DEVICES FOLLOWS; <br /> <br />WATER DISPLACEMENT DEVICES: (BAGS, DAMS AND SHORT FLUSH FLAPPERS) <br />DISPLACEMENT BAGS; ALTHOUGH THESE DEVICES ARE LOW IN INITIAL COST, <br />NOT ALL TOILETS ARE CONDUCIVE TO RETROFIT POSSIBILITIES. DISPLACEMENT <br />BAGS MAY DETERIORATE AND BECOME RENDERED USELESS, OR MAY CAUSE <br />PROBLEMS WITH OPERATION OF THE TOILETINTERNAL WORKING PARTS. MANY <br />COMPONENTS OF MUNICIPAL WATER HAVE A TENDENCY TO ATTACK THE <br />PLASTIC COMPONENTS, CAUSING THEM TO FAIL AT AN EARLY AGE. (2 TO 5 <br />YEARS DEPENDING ON WATER QUALITY, USE ETC...) IF THESE DEVICES ARE <br />CHOSEN, IT IS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT A TWICE YEARLY INSPECTION AND <br />REPLACEMENT PROGRAM. THE ECONOMICS OF A DEVICE OF THIS TYPE ARE <br />GENERALLY GOOD, BUT WHEN EXAMINED FROM A POTENTIAL WATER <br />REDUCTION STAND POINT, THEIR SAVINGS POTENTIAL ARE NOT AS HIGH AS <br />COMPLETE REPLACEMENT WITH A U.L.V. THIS METHOD OF CONSERVATION IS <br />