My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Castle Pines North WC Plan2007
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
DayForward
>
Castle Pines North WC Plan2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 1:44:44 PM
Creation date
5/1/2007 10:36:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Applicant
Castle Pines North Metropolitan District
Project Name
Water Conservation Plan
Title
Castle Pines North Metropolitan District Water Conservation Plan
Date
8/1/2006
County
Douglas
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
CPN Audit/Rainwater Applic
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN Audit/Rainwater Final Report
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN Calsense Application
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN Calsense Final Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN WCPlan Application
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN WCPlan Approval Ltr
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CDM <br /> <br />Section 8 <br />Integrate Resources and Modify Forecasts <br /> <br />8.4 Summary of Forecast Modifications and Benefits of <br />Conservation <br /> <br />Figure 8-1 shows the projected demands with and without conservation as well as an <br />assumed surface water supply capacity of 2,000 AFY and reuse of 240 AFY. Projected <br />demands with conservation were estimated by subtracting the total of the water <br />saving estimates presented in Section 7.2. As discussed in Section 8.1, these water <br />estimates were reduced by 20 percent to compensate for overlapping demands and <br />uncertainty on the level of customer participation. <br /> <br />2500 <br />2300 <br />f 2100 <br /><( <br />:; 1900 <br />c <br />co 1700 <br />E <br />~ 1500 <br />-g 1300 <br />co <br />~ 11 00 <br />a. <br />g- 900 <br />(/) <br />700 <br />500 <br /> <br /> <br />2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 <br /> <br />c::::J Surface Water Supply Capacity c::::J Reuse <br />____ Demand Without Conservation ---.- Demands With Conservation <br /> <br />Figure 8-1 <br />Supply and Projected Demands with and without Conservation <br /> <br />As discussed in Section 8.2, conservation will not significantly affect future capital <br />expenditures or the timing of development of new infrastructure. However, <br />conservation can reduce the amount of water consumed and consequently the <br />operation and maintenance costs to produce treated drinking water. Significant <br />conservation savings may also reduce the amount of water rights that are needed to <br />be purchased for surface water supplies. <br /> <br />8.5 Revenue Effects <br /> <br />Conservation can reduce the amount of revenue received by the District. As the <br />amount of water used by customers decreases, the less revenue the District receives. <br />Figure 8-2 shows projected revenues based on projected demands with and without <br />conservation. It is assumed that the District charges an average of $3.67 per <br />1,000 gallons for water. This price was derived by calculating a weighted average of <br />2006 tiered water rates and the projected amount of usage per tier. <br /> <br />8-3 <br /> <br />O:\Castle_Pines_North\Conservation Plan\Drafts Submitted For Review\Final Conservation Plan.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.