My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Castle Pines North WC Plan2007
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
DayForward
>
Castle Pines North WC Plan2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 1:44:44 PM
Creation date
5/1/2007 10:36:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Applicant
Castle Pines North Metropolitan District
Project Name
Water Conservation Plan
Title
Castle Pines North Metropolitan District Water Conservation Plan
Date
8/1/2006
County
Douglas
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
CPN Audit/Rainwater Applic
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN Audit/Rainwater Final Report
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN Calsense Application
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN Calsense Final Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN WCPlan Application
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
CPN WCPlan Approval Ltr
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Efficiency Grants\Day Forward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CDM <br /> <br />Section 3 <br />Water Use and Forecasted Demands <br /> <br />This is illustrated by examining per capita water use for the City of Los Angeles. <br />Figure 3-9 shows Los Angeles' per capita use from 1980 to 2004. In 1991, the last year <br />of a 5-year drought, Southern California water agencies imposed mandatory water <br />conservation. There was also an extensive drought education campaign in 1990 and <br />1991. This resulted in per capita water use to fall sharply from 1990 levels. In 1992 and <br />1993, the drought subsided but per capita use remained low due to what is called <br />drought memory effect. This occurs when water customers have had to change <br />behavior dramatically as a result of mandatory restrictions and drought education. <br />However, unless permanent conservation measures are put in place (e.g., ultra-low- <br />flush toilets, landscaping efficiency, etc.) per capita water use tends to increase to <br />levels near pre-drought levels. In California, this has occurred even when water rates <br />have increased. In 1998, a very wet year caused per capita use to fall again. But by <br />2004, per capita use was 30 gpcd higher than the low in 1991. This indicates that <br />although customers may continue to conserve water post drought, over time they <br />may conserve less and less and even increase water usage beyond pre-drought levels. <br />Nevertheless, conservation efforts are an important component establishing a water <br />management program that promotes a sustainable and reliable water supply. As long <br />as these conservation efforts continue, results in the form of water savings will occur. <br /> <br />2001 <br />190 <br /> <br /> <br />'E' <br />o <br />G') 1801 <br />W <br />Q:: <br />~ 1701 <br />('U <br />c <br />~ 160 <br />[5 <br />('V <br />~ <br />'--' <br /> <br />~ 1401 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ 130 <br />!:"Q <br />(.) <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />~ .1201 <br />(I) <br />c- <br /> <br /> <br />v- <br />a <br />o <br />N <br /> <br />1101 <br />100 <br /> <br />o <br />00 <br />CD <br />-.:-- <br /> <br />'T""" <br /> <br />Figure 3-9 <br />Los Angeles' per Capita Use <br /> <br />3-11 <br /> <br />O:\Castle_Pines_North\Conservation Plan\Drafts Submitted For Review\Final Conservation Plan.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.