Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CDM <br /> <br />Section 2 <br />Profile of Existing Water System <br /> <br />options and provide the District guidance in selecting a group of options that are best <br />suited for the District's needs. The development of the IWRP is divided into a four <br />step process that includes: <br /> <br />. Task 1: Investigating the current and future water demands <br /> <br />. Task 2: Assessing the effects of existing and future water conservation efforts <br /> <br />. Task 3: Evaluating the long-term sustainability of the District's existing <br />groundwater supply <br /> <br />. Task 4: Developing a long-term supply plan <br /> <br />The District is also planning on joining other entities in the South Metro area to <br />conduct a rain harvest study. This study will be evaluating water rights implications <br />if the study area collects rainwater for reuse. The collection of rainwater will reduce <br />the amount of runoff entering nearby streams, reducing the amount of water <br />downstream for other users. This study will focus on quantifying the amount of water <br />needed to compensate downstream users. <br /> <br />2.6 Current Water Conservation Activities <br /> <br />In 2003, the District began to implement a variety of conservation measures to <br />conserve water. These consist of adjusting water rates, watering restrictions, rebate <br />incentives, and public education. Table 2-10 provides details on each conservation <br />measure. Further details on water restrictions and the water rate structure are <br />provided in Sections 2.5 and 2.4, respectively. <br /> <br />Table 2-10 shows that the water savings from the majority of the conservation <br />activities are difficult to quantify. This is attributed to a variety of factors. For <br />instance, information on the unit savings for many of the retrofits is limited and the <br />savings also depends on behavior. Savings through education is highly variable and <br />depends on a variety of factors including the number of participants and regional <br />climatic factors. Customers are much more willing to respond to education if there is <br />an existing water shortage. Section 2.1 describes the per capita demand reductions <br />since the onset of the programs and provides further explanation on why limited <br />quantitative data is available on water savings. <br /> <br />Table 2-10 Current Conservation Activities <br /> <br /> Approximate Annual <br />Water Conservation Measures and Water Savings Since Implemented Is Planned to <br />Programs Implementation Since Continue? <br />Water Restrictions Unknown May 2003 Yes <br />Water Rate Structure - Increasing Unknown - The program May 2004 Yes <br />block rate structure with assigned is relatively new and <br />water budget there is not an adequate <br /> period of record to <br /> quantify savings. <br />Rebate Program See discussion below May 2003 Yes <br />Public Education Program Can not quantify 2004 Yes <br /> <br />2-11 <br /> <br />O:\Castle_Pines_North\Conservation Plan\Drafts Submitted For Review\Final Conservation Plan.doc <br />