My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sterling 1996 WC Plan
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Sterling 1996 WC Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 4:16:03 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:04:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Project Name
City of Sterling Water Conservation Plan
Title
Water Conservation Plan
Date
6/21/1996
County
Logan
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
Sterling 1996 WCPlan Apprvl Ltr
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Sterling 1996 WCPlan Proof of Publication
(Attachment)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Sterling 1996 WCPlan WorkPlan
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STERLING WATER CONSERVATION PLAN <br /> <br />MAY 28, 1996 <br /> <br />Water Distribution <br /> <br />The first pipeline to serve Sterting was made up of wood. It was installed in 1911 and <br />took water directly from the "springdale springs" artesian well and piped it into the Town <br />of Sterting without treatment. Domestic water is conveyed to the distribution system via <br />four transmission mains, a 24" diameter steel pipe, a 24" diameter ductile iron pipe, a <br />16" diameter ductile iron pipe, and a 14" cast iron pipe. <br /> <br />Sterting's distribution system is in average condition and has the capacity to transport <br />enough water to meet customer needs. Today, approximately 85 miles of pipelines <br />serve domestic water to customers. Distribution mains range in size from 4" to 24" in <br />diameter. Materials include cast iron, ductile iron, plastic (PVC), and steel. Lines are <br />currently being constructed by developers to serve new areas. <br /> <br />Unaccounted-for Water <br /> <br />The difference between total water production and water sales is referred to as <br />unaccounted-for water. Table 9 shows the amount of unaccounted for water each year <br />since 1988. Sterting's unaccounted-for water has averaged 24 percent of water <br />produced since 1988. Estimates have been made for known uses of unmetered water. <br />These uses include pari< irrigation, fire fighting, construction water, and water inain & <br />hydrant flushing. The unknown-losses are probably due to leaks and unauthorized <br />uses. <br /> <br />Table 9 - Unaccounted-for Water <br /> <br /> 1.988 198.9 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 AVG <br />Production 3.119 3,JA.6 3.056 3.128 3.TIO 3.467 4.TI5 4,342 3.4.55 <br />Consumption 2.759 2,538 2.595 2.752 2.558 2.460 3,050 2..385 2.640 <br />DIfference 420 708 461 376 552 987 1,065 1.95'7 816 <br />96 Unaccoutted for \396 2296 1596 1296 1896 2896 2696 4.596 2A-96 <br /> <br />All volues ore in ocre-feet <br />SOUICe: Sterling Public Worl<'s Office <br /> <br />If all of the City's facilities and customers were -metered, -system losses coutd be readily <br />calculated with reasonable accuracy by subtracting the total of all of the metered water <br />use from the total water delivered by the Cil). I low. fer, with some of the delivered <br />water being to unmetered customers and since most City facilities are also not metered, <br />there are several unknowns when estimating system losses. The besr estimate is that <br />our system losses are approximately 15 percent of the total amount delivered. This <br />would represent about 350 acre-feet of losses per year. <br /> <br />The larger than nonnal unaccounted-for water amount in 1995 was due to a large water <br />line leak in the South Platte River. Due to the fact that it was in the river bed, it was not <br />noticed until some time later. If all customers and City facilities were metered at that <br />time, a regular review of unaccounted-for water would have indicated the leak a lot <br />sooner, and therefore saved a considerable amount of water and money. <br /> <br />Page30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.