My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Grand Junction Retrofit Prog Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Grand Junction Retrofit Prog Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2011 11:55:27 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:01:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
General OWC
Applicant
City of Grand Junction
Project Name
Residential Retrofit Project
Title
Preliminary Report
Date
8/17/1992
County
Mesa
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Interim Reports
Document Relationships
Grand Junction Retrofit Customer Correspondence
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Grand Junction Retrofit Final Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Grand Junction Retrofit Survey
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Grand Junction Retrofit WorkPlan
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Washington State Conservation Fact Sheet
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Ouestion: Would you recommend the use of the water saving shower head? <br />Yes - 96% No - 4% <br /> <br />Ouestion: Would you recommend the use of the faucet aerators? <br />Yes-95% No-5% <br /> <br />Ouestion: When asked to rate the new showerhead in comparison to their old <br />head, the following responses were tallied. <br />Better - 50% Same - 32% Other - 18% <br /> <br />Ouestion: When asked to rate the performance of the dual flush toilet device to <br />their old unit the following responses were tallied. <br />Better - 46.3% Same - 26.8% Other 26.8% <br /> <br />Ouestion: When asked about their overall opinion of the shower head on a rating <br />scale of 1-5, 5 being excellent, the following results were tallied. <br />1 - 5.45% 2 - 3.64% 3 - 9.09% 4 - 32.7% 5 - 49.09% <br /> <br />Ouestion: When asked about their overall opinion of the faucet aerators on a <br />ratings scale of 1-5, 5 being excellent, the following results were tallied. <br />1 - 0% 2 - 5.36% 3 - 14.2% 4 - 28.6% 5 - 51.8% <br /> <br />Ouestion: When asked about their overall opinion of the toilet device on a ratings <br />scale of 1-5, 5 being excellent, the fol/owing results were tal/ied. <br />1 - 10.17% 2 - 3.39% 3 - 20.34% 4 - 42.37% 5 - 23.7% <br /> <br />DATABASE ANALYSIS <br />The software used for the data analysis is Lotus 123 3.1. This software provides <br />the user with a three dimensional feature which allows separation of records by <br />individual customer account. This feature also enables the user to enter the data <br />for each customer on a separate worksheet. <br /> <br />The database has been designed to analyze the mean monthly and mean daily <br />consumption. variance, standard deviation. sample variance, sample standard <br />based on the monthly billing cycle and actual meter readings of water. gas and <br />electricity. The worksheet shows data for water and energy use. Gas and electric <br />data is collected by Public service and the water data is collected by the Grand <br />Junction water utility. A table at the end of the spreadsheet analyzes the above <br />data and includes a spreadsheet that represents the mean of differences, standard <br />of differences, count, standard error of means and the t-test. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.