My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Grand Junction Retrofit Prog Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
Grand Junction Retrofit Prog Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2011 11:55:27 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 9:01:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
General OWC
Applicant
City of Grand Junction
Project Name
Residential Retrofit Project
Title
Preliminary Report
Date
8/17/1992
County
Mesa
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Interim Reports
Document Relationships
Grand Junction Retrofit Customer Correspondence
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Grand Junction Retrofit Final Report
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Grand Junction Retrofit Survey
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Grand Junction Retrofit WorkPlan
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
Washington State Conservation Fact Sheet
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\Backfile
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. to determine the program cost effectiveness for both residents and <br />the Grand Junction water utility; <br /> <br />3. to determine long term water savings potential from retrofit; <br /> <br />4. and to evaluate device acceptance levels from homeowners <br /> <br />Water and energy consumption data will be collected for a period of 18 months <br />ending in October 1992. This period will include one full winter water-use season <br />which is important to isolate interior water use from exterior use and weather <br />variables. The final analysis will be conducted after 18 months of data collection. <br /> <br />SURVEY <br />A survey was mailed to participating homeowners in September 1991. Survey <br />questions helped determine how well the devices were working and homeowner <br />perceptions about the devices. Below are select survey results. <br /> <br />Question: Please indicate the number of permanent residents in the following <br />categories. <br />0-10 10.4% 11-18 15.2% 19-30 6.2% 30-60 50% 60+ 18% <br /> <br />Question: Please indicate the total household income by category. <br />0-$20,000 32.8% $20,000-$30,000 29.3% <br />$30,000-$40,000 24.1 % $40,000+ 13.8% <br /> <br />Question: By what method do you water your lawn? <br />Automated - 36.84% Manual- 63.16% <br /> <br />Question: Did you install the dual flush toilet device by yourself? <br />Yes - 42.1 % No - 57.9% <br /> <br />Ouestion: Did you install the showerhead by yourself? <br />Yes - 59% No - 41 % <br /> <br />Question: Did you install the aerators by yourself? <br />Yes - 67% No - 33% <br /> <br />Question: Do you like the looks of the dual flush toilet device? <br />Yes - 92.9% No - 7.1% <br /> <br />Question: Would you recommend the use of the dual flush toilet device? <br />Yes - 80.7% No - 19.3% <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.