Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3. Where idea ~ from and research obtained <br /> <br />For several years Silt has been using a passive water con- <br />servation education program initiated through the Public Works <br />Department. During that time much research has gone into tracking <br />water usage and possible ways to reduce the loss of treated <br />water. The cost of producing water and the amount of water needed <br />for consumption has steadily risen. For the production side, much <br />of the cost is tied up in chemical treatment, and little can be <br />done about the expense until alternatives to present methods <br />bring down costs. The remedy to water consumption needs has <br />always been to produce more water, rather than focus on better <br />utilization of existing production. Surrounding both problems are <br />the increasingly stringent Clean Water Act regulations, which hit <br />Silt hard as the town is the first to take water from the Colora- <br />do River for consumption. <br />Secondary research is coming from current experiments in the <br />city of Grand Junction, as well as case studies from the Rocky <br />Mountain Institute of Technology in Snowmass. Silt has not re- <br />ceived the full results of these studies yet, but expect to by <br />mid February, 1992. Initial results from these sources have been <br />very positive, and have influenced the project outlined in this <br />application. <br />By focusing on conservation, every facet of water production <br />can be positively affected. Silt currently produces around sixty <br />million gallons of treated water a year. This amount rises about <br />1.2% a year. Much of this water is lost to lawns and gardens and <br />other no-consumption uses during the year. By reducing production <br />by 20% through conservation, less water is needed during the <br />year, and more water is available down river. The predominant <br />benefits to the town are water plant longevity and reduced pro- <br />duction costs. Although the plant is not completely taxed for <br />production, conservation extends the life of the current plant <br />well beyond the first decade of the 21st century. Less use means <br />less production; less production brings down treatment costs and <br />allows additional down river use; lower treatment costs and <br />production extends the life of the current water plant; longer <br />life of the water plant means no new taxes to expand the plant. <br />This application is based on current needs in Silt concern- <br />ing water usage and conservation benefits. The loss of produced <br />water to poor use will eventually cause Silt to have expand its <br />current facilities, a very large and expensive process. By con- <br />serving what is currently used, Silt and those farther down river <br />benefit. <br />The town has explored the alternative of using untreated <br />water system for lawns and gardens in the summer. This, however <br />is many years down the road, and does not address the immediate <br />problem of production/consumption mentioned above. There is a <br />need to make sure there are effective measures taken now to <br />insure there is no water problem later. Conservation is the <br />logical and most effective means a~ailable. <br /> <br />2 <br />