My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
DWR_2717593
DWR
>
Dam Safety
>
2015
>
03
>
DWR_2717593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2017 11:09:13 AM
Creation date
3/3/2015 11:31:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Dam Safety
Document Date
2/27/2015
Document Type - Dam Safety
Report
Division
5
Dam ID
040110
Subject
CARRIAGE HILLS #2 (LOWER) DAM - FAILURE FORENSIC REPORT REVISED
DWR Send/Recipient
DSB
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CARRIAGE HILLS NO. 2 DAM, Dam Failure Forensic Investigation Report Page 29 <br />February 27, 2015 <br />estimated by the USBR using reservoir stage data along with measured outlet gate openings throughout the <br />storm. Using the storage and outflow hydrographs, Jacobs was able to estimate the Lake Estes inflow <br />hydrograph for the Sept. 2013 flood. This combined inflow hydrograph does not differentiate between various <br />sources of inflow to Lake Estes, so all subbasins, including Fish Creek, were calibrated uniformly. Caution needs <br />to be exercised in using model results from individual subbasins (e.g. Fish Creek) since they were not individually <br />calibrated. Jacobs reports that they calibrated the model to best‐fit basin‐wide peaks, so as not to overly rely on <br />individual observed or estimated peak flows. They cited Robert Jarrett’s work and a USGS report (Godt et. all, <br />2013) in concluding that surge flows from sudden failures of debris dams, embankment dams, road <br />embankments, etc. all played a major role in some peak flows during the Sept. 2013 flood. Their HEC‐HMS <br />model is solely a rainfall‐runoff model and is not intended to reproduce dam breaks or surge flows. <br /> <br />The Jacobs model shows Fish Creek peaking around 2000 cfs on Sept. 12, 2013 at 1400 hrs (MDT), which was <br />after the storm’s second large spike in rain intensity (Figure 21). The model shows a second lower peak of 1900 <br />cfs on Fish Creek on Sept. 13, 2013, around 0200 hrs, which is after the third and final large spike in rain <br />intensity. The Jacobs model also shows that large inflows to Lake Estes (peak inflow of 5280 cfs) in the early <br />morning of Sept. 13th could have been explained by rain‐driven runoff on the mainstem Big Thompson (model <br />Reach R330, peak 3500 cfs) (see Figure 22). DWR’s Big Thompson Above Lake Estes (BTABESCO) stream gage <br />gave a peak flow of around 3000 cfs on Sept. 13th, between 0000 and 0600 hrs. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 21: CDOT/Jacobs HEC‐HMS model Sept. 2013 Fish Creek hydrograph (model subbasin BT05) in Universal <br />Coordinated Time (UTC). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.