My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
DWR_2717593
DWR
>
Dam Safety
>
2015
>
03
>
DWR_2717593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2017 11:09:13 AM
Creation date
3/3/2015 11:31:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Dam Safety
Document Date
2/27/2015
Document Type - Dam Safety
Report
Division
5
Dam ID
040110
Subject
CARRIAGE HILLS #2 (LOWER) DAM - FAILURE FORENSIC REPORT REVISED
DWR Send/Recipient
DSB
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CARRIAGE HILLS NO. 2 DAM, Dam Failure Forensic Investigation Report Page 28 <br />February 27, 2015 <br />operating gages on Fish Creek at the time of the flood ‐‐ the previous Division of Water Resources (DWR) stream <br />gage on Fish Creek had been discontinued as of October 2012 when the sponsor agreement was terminated. <br />7.5.1 Review of Other Studies on the Sept. 2013 Fish Creek Flood: The following studies provided important <br />information for our investigation of the Carriage Hills No. 2 Dam failure flood. <br /> <br />7.5.1.1 Colorado Front Range Flood of 2013: Peak Flow Estimates at Selected Mountain Stream Locations, USDA <br />NRCS, December 2013: The NRCS published some of the first peak flow estimates following the Sept. 2013 <br />floods. They used a critical depth method at surveyed cross‐sections and surveyed high water marks. They <br />analyzed and averaged results at three cross‐sections on Fish Creek, located approximately 1000‐ft upstream of <br />Lake Estes. They originally computed a peak flow of 6,900 cfs on Fish Creek, with reported accuracy of +/‐15% <br />for the critical depth method. This results in 442 cfs/sq. mi., one of the highest yields reported. According to <br />Matrix Design Group’s Fish Creek Hydrology Report (Reference 7) the NRCS later revised their peak estimate for <br />Fish Creek down to 4,800 cfs after better representing backwater effects from Lake Estes. <br /> <br />7.5.1.2 DRAFT Public Communications Guide, Colorado Rains and Flood 2013, USBR, updated October 21, 2013: <br />The USBR documented its flood response at Olympus Dam/Lake Estes in this document. Lake Estes is located <br />about 1.6 miles downstream of Carriage Hills No. 2 Dam at the confluence of Fish Creek and the Big Thompson <br />River. The DSB used the USBR’s timeline of events to compile Table 7 below, showing Olympus Dam/Lake Estes <br />estimated inflows and outflows. <br /> <br /> Table 7 <br /> <br /> <br />7.5.1.3 Hydrologic Evaluation of the Big Thompson Watershed, Post September 2013 Flood Event, Colorado <br />Department of Transportation, prepared by Jacobs, August 2014: Jacobs created a calibrated hydrological <br />model of the 10‐day Sept. 2013 flood for the Big Thompson River basin. The purpose of their study was to <br />model frequency storms for revising flood frequency estimates throughout the basin. The model was created in <br />HEC‐HMS and was driven by rain data from Applied Weather Associates. Jacobs obtained estimated Olympus <br />Dam discharge and Lake Estes Storage hydrographs from the USBR. Olympus Dam releases were reportedly
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.