Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Roy Karo <br />C- 1992 -081; TRIO <br />Adequacy Review No. I <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Tab 12; Facilities: <br />5.) The revised page 6 of Tab 12 in regards to HG Shallow Well No. 1 indicates the well abandonment report <br />for this well is located in Tab 14, attachment 14 -4. There does not appear to be an attachment 14 -4 in Tab <br />14. However, also included with TRIO was the well abandonment report for this well, the insertion <br />instructions indicate this report should be included in Appendix 7 -4. Please revise page 6 accordingly. <br />Tab 20; Revegetation Plan: <br />6.) Item 425 and 26 of the Divisions adequacy review for RN4 discusses the post mine vegetation <br />designation for areas along the Tie - Across Haul Road. Exhibit 20 -2 depicts areas to be revegetated as <br />cropland using small grains. However, the text of Tab 20 does not contain a seed mixture or any <br />revegetation plan for the cropland area. Also, the text does not explain the measures to be used to <br />determine the success of revegetation in accordance with Rule 4.15.9 for cropland areas. This <br />information will need to be included in the permit. <br />Tab 23; Bonding: <br />7.) The insertion instructions submitted with the revision indicates to remove the entire Tab 23 contents and <br />replace it with the Divisions Reclamation Cost Estimate for RN4. Do you want to remove Attachment <br />23 -1 and Attachment 23 -2 as well? <br />This concludes the Division's review of the TRIO application. The decision date for this revision is May 5, 2013, <br />if you need additional time to address the Division's concerns please submit a request for an extension of the <br />decision date. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. <br />Sincerelv, <br />Jared Ebert <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />DRMS <br />Enclosures: 1.) Appendix 3 -1, Pages 3 -1.1 to 3 -1.4 <br />