2013-01-23_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008

Home Browse Search

JoEllen Turner 970 - 864 -7682 p.4 are concise and clearly written. AND THIS ONE, ALL LIES AGAIN. Our rights have been violated because they CHANGE THE RULES AS THEY GO TO SUIT THEMSELVES AND WHATEVER FITS WFC. Examples are 1.04 land uses designations, the definition of land use, the definition of historically used as cropland, the definition of a prime farmland investigation, the use of soil surveys to take the place of a prime farmland investigation such as the QUALITY not quantity, the requirements of a prime farmland investigation, not just to determine but to acquire a negative decision, the use of "SITE SPECIFIC" and the requirements governing soil sampling, and the AFTER THE FACT MINING BEING COMPLETED TO TRY AND CHANGE THE MORGAN PROPERTY TO SOMETHING IT WASN'T WITH ''ASSUMPTIONS" AND" BELIEFS" ALL OF WHICH HAD TO BE DONE PRIOR TO MINING AND HAD TO BE FACTUAL, NOT ASSUMPTIONS AND BELIEFS. Our rights have been violated because when we try and tell the STATE the history of this place and what has happened, we are ignored and some of our objections as documented were thrown away and ignored because Mr. Morgan himself did not sign them and because they thought our main objection was TR -55 and even though we protested permit renewal number 5, they didn't believe that this should be recognized and just looked at TR -55 and threw our objections to Permit number 5 out. Our rights have been violated because we were limited to only discuss FOUR things at the FORMAL hearing and we were not allowed to give the Board the HISTORY as was the STATE and was WFC. They gave the BOARD the history, but left out the TRUTH, and we were not allowed to refute testimony given by them. Omissions of the truth at the formal hearing also took place which we were not allowed to tell. Our rights were violated because of the Pre - Conference hearing. WFC submitted by Kamper his version of the history, to Mr. Stover, and sent threatening letters to all my witnesses and threatening letters to the Morgans and submitted his version to Bruce Stover, and we were ordered that we could not even attempt to contact this pre- conference hearing officer Mr. Stover. The State, you included in this record preparation, documented that Michael Morgan and Myself were the only ones that checked in at this pre - conference hearing all of which was not true. All 3 teachers called in and had conversations with Marcia Talvitie and we were not permitted to be a part of these conversations, Dirk Richards checked in Mr. and Mrs Morgan checked in and none of these people are even mentioned. Our rights were violated because they told us that the pre - conference hearing was taped and now they say it wasn't. Mr. Stover told us that the other 35 objectors would have an opportunity to have a formal hearing since the objection period was not even closed but at this formal hearing held in November that ONLY MICHAEL MORGAN AND JOELLEN TURNER COULD ATTEND, NOT EVEN MR OR MRS MORGAN COULD BE THERE. Our rights have been violated because we were ORDERED that the only discussions that would be allowed at the formal hearing were PR -06 AND NOTHING ELSE. WFC presented their payroll and how much money they donate and brought all their employees to this formal hearing, all of which testified to how important their jobs were and how WFC had donated money to the schools, and how WFC was so valuable to them making a living and so was our living important which wasn't mentioned. Well you know what, NOT ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT PR -06 AND not one of those employees had ever read the 2500 page document of pr -06, not one. The one person who had read pr-06 was Roger Carver and Paul Cooper read portions and they were 4 1 ?ag