Laserfiche WebLink
JoEllen Turner <br />970 - 864 -7682 p.3 <br />MANAGER. AND I WAS ACCUSED BY KAMPER AND WFC AND EVEN COURT <br />ACCUSED BY KAMPER AND LANCE AND EVEN THREATENED WITH A <br />RESTRAINING ORDER AND ACCUSED OF TAKING PICTURES AND GOING ALL <br />OVER THE PROPERTY ON WEEKENDS WHICH WAS DOWN RIGHT UNTRUE. IT <br />WAS NEVER ME. I know that in court Kamper and WFC tried to have the Judge RULE <br />that we couldn't even take pictures from this PUBLIC road. Our rights have been <br />violated and under the ACT, these things should not have ever been allowed. No prime <br />farmland investigation, no segregation of our soils, no consultation with NRCS or the <br />USDA, fabricated documents by WFC, Minor revisions that were acquired under <br />fraudulent acts, documetations of N/A in all permits regarding prime farmlands and <br />investigations, fraudulent documentation regarding the 1 996 soil survey done by Dean <br />Stindt and the conclusions of Jim Irvines was fraudulent, the depths of our soils were <br />not accurately done by the so- called expert, Dejoia and Dunker, conclusions were <br />obtained without NRCS approval and consultations and without the landowner being <br />involved in any discussions with NRCS, NRCS documents being ignored, NRCS <br />determinations of Barx soils for over 50 years being ignored and by- passed, NRCS <br />letters being ignored, Dr. Borch from CSU and all the professors of his department of <br />CSU and their documentation as well as Dr. Cipra with NRCS experience being <br />ignored, and the landowner and land owner representatives not being allowed to be part <br />of any of these secretly held gatherings making major decisions concerning the Morgan <br />property that has caused serious damages to the Morgans. Our rights have been <br />violated under the ACT because our property was to be reclaimed in a "TIMELY <br />MANNER" and as contemporeously as possible and the state has used an ENTIRE 5 <br />year period in their permitting just for a MID -TERM review and technical and minor <br />revisions have been used illegally causing damages and violating our rights since minor <br />revisions are not publicized and technical revisions allow only 10 days to object and for <br />us to have 300 pages of documentation and weekends are not available at the court <br />house.Extensions after extensions over a 5 year period was given to WFC continuously, <br />so many, unbelievable, but when we came back from the hospital and saw TR -57 in the <br />paper and saw that it was not at the court house, as even recently, and had no way of <br />reading it and asked MARCIA TALVITIE to please allow us an extension beyond that 10 <br />days, she absolutely refused and then faxed us 20 pages which we objected to. She <br />refused our first objection and our rights were completely violated here. The State was <br />raking MAJOR changes to our property without our consent and knowledge and WE <br />WERE GUARNATEED BY MARCIA AND DAN MATHEWS THAT NO DECISIONS <br />WOULD BE MADE AT THAT MEETING, and Mike Boulay documented that it was to be <br />a permit revision and we would be involved, so our rights again, were violated. And the <br />BOARD was never told about any of this .and the adequacy reviews of these were <br />never told or given to us and they made major changes involving our property. Pr -06, <br />we were given the adequacy reviews, but the contradcitory and untruths that were told <br />were never resolved because they were not legal and did not comply with the ACT , so <br />to show that they did, they just fabricated the material and our rights again were <br />violated. Some of the permit revisions and technical revisions have taken 2 years and <br />mid term reviews 5 years with extension after extension and we weren't allowed even <br />one. Our rights have been violated because these documents are to be concise and <br />clearly written and some of them contradict, fragmented sentences and none of them <br />3IPage <br />