Laserfiche WebLink
JoEllen Turner <br />970 -864 -7682 p.6 <br />you can grow corn under a sideroll. Dejoia testified that all of it could be irrigated very <br />easily, yet he has never irrigated any new ground over here in this area. And just so the <br />so called experts know, WATER WILL NOT RUN UP HILL! <br />The soil survey of 1996, again , these people are trying to dazzle you with brilliance or <br />baffle you with bullshit and as it clearly shows, it is the latter. Dean Stindt came out. <br />Remember, I am working for Western Fuels and know and see everything that was <br />going on with this property. This was a soil survey that included the GarveylBurbridge <br />properties and had NOTHING to do with us. It also was determined to be PROGRESSO <br />soils and again had nothing to do with us. They NEVER consulted NRCS or USDA <br />concerning our property. And as they want you to believe that this was another <br />disqualification of Barx being a prime soil, his absolutely was not. AND WHERE IN THE <br />ATTACHMENTS IS THIS SO- CALLED PROOF DEJOIA AND LEWICKI STATE IS <br />THERE? ? ? ?? IT ISN'T AND CANT BE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXISTS!!!! <br />Mr. Lewicki has not a clue. Quote "truck - shovel loads the dump truck." If these people <br />can't even get the simplests things correct, just like "corrugated" pipe, then how can a <br />permit even be approved with so many false statements. Please explain sir, how a <br />truck- shovel loads a dump truck and by the way, what is a truck- shovel and when did <br />they get dump trucks ? ? ?? WATER CANNOT RUN UPHILL FOLKS mil <br />"The Bench one Suitable material is differentiated from the bottom of lift B (c horizon) by <br />greater percentage of coarse fragments. " When did this happen. They did "COLOR" <br />change from the beginning and no bench one material can be considered suitable <br />unless the proper testing is done which never was and it had to be preserved and <br />protected which it never was. AND I HAVE PICTURES OF THE SO- CALLED <br />SUITABLE PILE OF ROCKS AS BIG AS MY VOLKSWAGON ALREADY SUBMITTED <br />MANY TIMES. None of this happened and even when I have disked the small acreage <br />that was laid, 1 pulled up rocks that could not be removed except with the backhoe!1! <br />AND MARCIA was there and I have pictures with MARCIA and the rest in the gang in <br />them showing ROCKs during the soil sampling bigger than my rock picker can handle. <br />The point is we had NO ROCKS IN OUR TOPSOIL OR SUBSOIL AND THE LAW <br />PROTECTS THAT WE DO NOT HAVE TO GET LESS THAN WHAT WE HAD BACK <br />TO US. Ross Gubka documented that NRCS stated that ALL of our soils needed to be <br />returned JUST LIKE THEY WERE and to the same place they were and the aggregated <br />total prime farmland that has already been determined many times can not be <br />diminished from what we had prior to mining. THIS IS DOCUMENTED BY NRCS, <br />ROSS GUBKA, AND THE STATE. <br />Our Eastern half of our property didn't have greater thicknesses. The ground was frozen <br />and Jim Irvine could only go down so deep. When the actual mining began, our soils <br />were 15 foot deep plus. Not as documented. Pictures of our soils , "A" lift 4 feet or better <br />documented by WFC as 18 inches, "B" lift 15 feet thick documented by WFC as 3 feet. <br />This was also a written complaint given to Mr. Berry and to OSM at the time it was <br />taking place. This was also a complaint that was submitted to DRMS and pictures to <br />prove it and the duty of the MINE is to SALVAGE ALL AVAILABLE TOPSOIL AS <br />STATED IN THE RULES. Each area is "site specific" and all available topsoil must be <br />salvaged. It's amazing how Lewicki can describe all of this without being here and take <br />the word of WFC who isn't and hasn't done their job and and tell you why they had this <br />cut off in salvaging materials when we had deep deep pockets of rich red soils some of <br />161 Pa <br />