My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-06-04_REVISION - M1977493 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1996-06-04_REVISION - M1977493 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:27:02 PM
Creation date
12/10/2012 7:27:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/4/1996
Doc Name
Preliminary Design for new Environmental Protection Facility.
From
Climax
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR7
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> PUMPING REQUIREMENTS AND WATER LEVELS <br /> The inflow scenario described above was modeled to determine the required <br /> pumping capacity. The results show that one 629 pump could adequately return the <br /> subdrain, EPR return, and tributary runoff flows with a maximum change of storage in <br /> Robinson Reservoir of about 1,000 acre feet or less, depending on the number of stages <br /> in the pumps. Two 629 pumps would have the capability of fully controlling the reservoir <br /> levels with minimal increase in storage during runoff, an ideal situation. <br /> Previous evaluation of the pump characteristics for the 629 pumps revealed that <br /> there are two practical options for configuring the pumps. To provide the pump capacity <br /> proposed in the original design, reconfiguring the pumps to a four-stage system was <br /> believed to be the best arrangement because it would minimize the use of the third pump <br /> in wet years. For the revised alternative, the four-stage arrangement would still be <br /> preferred. The four-stage option would yield pump capacities of 2,500 gpm for the first <br /> pump and 4,300 gpm for two pumps in parallel. <br /> The fact that two of the 629 pumps will provide excess capacity for the system <br /> begs the question of whether smaller pumps should be considered. The 629 pumps cannot <br /> be modified for lower capacity without incurring a significant penalty in efficiency. We do <br /> not recommend smaller pumps for the following reasons: <br /> 1. The reuse of the 629 pumps, with a reported excellent history of <br /> maintenance, is a distinct advantage. This is particularly true since they are <br /> already stainless steel and relatively minor adjustments are needed to <br /> convert them for use at the pump station. The cost for purchasing smaller <br /> stainless steel pumps would be much greater than modifying the pumps on <br /> hand. In addition, since only two pumps are recommended, the additional <br /> pump can be stored and reserved as a spare for future years. <br /> 2. The capacity of two 629 pumps to provide full control of the water level in <br /> Robinson Reservoir, even during high runoff years such as 1984 and 1995, <br /> should provide a comfortable margin of design such that floods of higher <br /> magnitude can likely be controlled as well. The modeling results for the <br /> existing and past system configuration and hydrology show that there is a <br /> marginal capacity for controlling runoff exceeding those years and that the <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.