My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1978-02-07_PERMIT FILE - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1978-02-07_PERMIT FILE - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2020 5:54:54 AM
Creation date
11/29/2012 7:21:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/7/1978
Doc Name
Permit Application Questions
From
MLRD
To
Climax
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 4 <br /> e. If treatment of water must occur after mining (and even during) <br /> where is the sludge disposed? <br /> ;r 4. Page 2 - 2: Does all water get recycled or is some water lost by <br /> C seepage? If so, where does it go? <br /> U 5. Page 2 - 6: You state it will only be a matter of time before <br /> benches visibly disappear. How long? Could some application be <br /> Q used to break up the remaining bench pattern or accelerate the <br /> obliteration? <br /> 6. Page 2 - 6: You seem to be saying that the primary criterion for <br /> deciding where what waste goes is access to a dump area. Is there <br /> <, some„way to separate more favorable materials and place them in <br /> locations where they can do the most good? <br /> ��6 ® 7. Page 6 - 1: Does Climax Molybdenum Company consider that land they <br /> call "reclaimed" is not affected?and? <br /> 8. Page 6 - 2 and 3: Are these "excluded" canals and ditches still used? <br /> If so, they are affected land and should be bonded unless they are <br /> nt,�V clearly excludable as being acceptably reclaimed. <br /> -(e-Y, i"9 <br /> C04 ,yl 9. Page 8 - 18: If the Clinton Canal needs to be maintained, how much <br /> ® maintenance is required, and who will do it? <br /> 10. Page 8 - 19: How much water will these 42" decant lines carry? Will <br /> it be sufficient to prevent any p,,ding at the "probablc maximum flood?" <br /> 11. Page 8 - 15 (et al) : What happens after the wire holding the gabions <br /> in the interceptor canals disintigrates? Where does the stability <br /> come from? Wouldn't it be necessary to periodically clean out the <br /> canals of debris that accumulates? What CFS were the canals designed <br /> to handle? What is the "probablZ maximum flood" CFS? <br /> 12. Page 8 - 12 and 1: What techniques will be used in directing the <br /> pond-to-pond flow so as to prevent channel cutting into the tailings <br /> m � below the rock veneers? <br /> 13. Page 10 - 8 and 9: On the shrub plantings, we need a more definitive <br /> O statement as to what you would plant now if you had to reclaim it now. <br /> Also, we need an indication of the pattern of planting that would be <br /> used. <br /> O 14. Page 10 - 11: What is your best estimate of the duration of the <br /> fertilizer maintenance program? <br /> 15. Page 10 - 12 and 13: There is too much emphasis on research problems <br /> and not sufficient information on what would be done now if you had to <br /> do it now. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.