My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1978-02-07_PERMIT FILE - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1978-02-07_PERMIT FILE - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2020 5:54:54 AM
Creation date
11/29/2012 7:21:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/7/1978
Doc Name
Permit Application Questions
From
MLRD
To
Climax
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEPAR III III III tfctorRCESSTAT HARD <br /> DLGovernor <br /> Harris 999 <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION , <br /> 723 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 892-3567 <br /> C. C. McCall, <br /> delbruary 7, 1978 Administrator <br /> Ron Zuck, Environmental Engineer <br /> Climax Molybdenum Company <br /> Climax, Colorado 80429 <br /> RE: Permit Application Questions. Our file #77-493. <br /> Dear Mr. Zuck: <br /> We have completed our review of the permit application for the Climax <br /> Mine, with the exception of the legal review. We have a number of <br /> t, questions concerning the application that should be adequately addressed <br /> prior to Board action. Our questions and comments are arranged in an <br /> order of decreasing importance with the least vital at the end of the <br /> list, however, this arrangement is only approximate. <br /> 1. Enclosed is a copy of the State Engineer's letter of February 2. <br /> We feel these items should be responded to, with -the exception of <br /> those comments which are favorable. <br /> 2. What assurances are here that the Glory Hole will hold water? If <br /> seepage occurs, as you indicate it probably will, where will the <br /> seepage go? What will be the quality of this water? Will it <br /> support life? <br /> 3. Tailings and Water Problems: <br /> a. It is our understanding that you must extract pyrite from the ore <br /> Dto recover one of the minerals. Why place this pyrite back in <br /> the tailings? Why not keep it isolated so it can be handled in <br /> one place? <br /> b. If the seepage water must be treated prior to release into Ten <br /> D � Mile or Eagle River drainages, who will conduct this treatment? <br /> �? How long will it have to be continued? If such treatment is <br /> necessary, can the area properly be considered reclaimed? <br /> C. How does the three (3) 'feet thick veneer inhibit water infiltration <br /> so an equilibrium and possible perpetual seepage does not occur? <br /> If any ponding would occur, how much and what effect would it have <br /> 4%, ��� ���� on pond stability? <br /> d. Why are the Robinson and Ten Mile Tailings Ponds kept active for <br /> so long? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.