Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Robert Hagen - 2 - October 28, 1991 <br /> The Division has historically estimated demolition and disposal costs based on <br /> the Means unit costs , and, based on bond forfeiture projects we have <br /> experience with, these unit costs are reasonable. Thus , the additional <br /> handling and disposal costs are not appropriate. <br /> The WSC estimate should be revised to reflect the 37 feet road width, and <br /> exclude the $535,544.00 debris handling and disposal cost. Thus , the direct <br /> cost for reclamation would total $2,423,308.00. This is less than the <br /> Division' s original direct cost estimate of $2,431 ,530.00. Differences <br /> between Division and WSC assessment of indirect costs would result in a grand <br /> total of $3,036,405.00 compared to the MLRD estimate of $2,993,000.00, <br /> resulting in a difference of less than 1 .5%. This difference is reconciled <br /> given the nature of cost estimating procedures and associated assumptions . <br /> Therefore, based on the site specific road width data, and a more practical <br /> application of the Means demolition costs , we do not believe that a <br /> significant bonding difference between our estimate and the WSC estimate <br /> exists . <br /> As always , we will continue to monitor the Coal Basin site. Should it become <br /> apparent that re-evaluation of the bond is necessary, we will act quickly to <br /> have the operator resubmit the appropriate bond. At this time, however, no <br /> operator submittals are necessary nor is a Notice of Violation warranted. <br /> I hope that this information is sufficient such that the AFO determines our <br /> response to be appropriate. Please contact me or Dan Mathews if you have <br /> questions or comments . <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Steven G. Renner <br /> Coal Program Supervisor <br /> SGR/scg <br /> CC: Dave Bucknam <br /> Dan Mathews <br /> 9029F <br />