My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (230)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (230)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 10:10:30 AM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:58:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) 1999 Correspondence
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3) Slope Reduction of Old Refuse Pile above Dutch Creek - est. $125,000 <br /> The Old Refuse Pile is also stacked steeply above Dutch Creek and is <br /> vulnerable to flash flooding in the creek. The DMG hopes to be awarded a <br /> grant to move a portion of the pile toward the central portion of the facility and <br /> excavate the upper extent of the underlying cut bank to a gentler slope to <br /> minimize the potential of the pile from collapsing into the creek. <br /> Cost Effectiveness SummarX <br /> What we have here is a very difficult reclamation project, in a very highly <br /> erosive area, at very high elevation, with significant areas of angle of repose <br /> slopes (many of which are a result of poor planning and construction), that is <br /> under-budgeted, is being managed very well, and is achieving average <br /> reclamation very cost effectively. The DMG is seeking funds from sources other <br /> than the bond to supplement the budget. Yet, MCR wants to stop even this level <br /> of reclamation in general and wants to stop the steep slope revegetation in <br /> particular in the grounds that it is not necessary and that monies are being <br /> wasted. I disagree. The project should not be stopped. In fact, the steep slope <br /> reclamation is one of the most important aspects of the entire project. <br /> Even with this level of reclamation, the project should be costing <br /> something closer to the values shown in the following table (assuming the <br /> project goes for 2 more years only): <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.