My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-07-08_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2002004 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:41 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 1:32:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/8/2002
Doc Name
ATTACHMENT, PART 3
From
HABITAT MGMT
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k inch of minerals The water - holding capacity is <br />dependent upon these properties. <br />INITIAL EXPERIMENTS COMPARING TOPSOIL <br />WITH CHEMICAL AMENDMENTS <br />AND STRAW MULCH <br />When the first reclamation law was passed in <br />North Dakota in 1970, initial efforts were focused on <br />the reestablishment of vegetation on reshaped <br />spoils. Sandoval et al. (1973) noted that the severity <br />of revegetation problems increased as the clay con- <br />tent and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) of <br />the spoils increased. They observed that while spoil <br />properties varied widely within and between mine <br />areas, the severity of the problems associated with <br />high clay and high sodium contents also tended to <br />increase with overburden depth at each site. <br />The earliest work on vegetative reestablishment in <br />North Dakota compared replacement of topsoil with <br />applications of chemical amendments and straw <br />mulch (Sandoval et al., 1973; Power et al., 1974; and <br />Power et al., 1975). Typical results from one experi- <br />ment are given in Table 1; the spoil at this location <br />has an ESP of about 25. These results indicate that <br />while gypsum applied to sodic spoil increased pro- <br />duction, much higher yields were obtained when 2 <br />inches of topsoil was applied. Straw mulching in- <br />creased vegetative production both on topsoiled and <br />nontopsoiled plots. <br />Table 1. Slender wheatgrass yields as affected by chemical <br />amendments, straw mulch, and topsoil application on <br />highly sodic spoil (Power et al., 1974). <br />Amendment No straw Straw No straw Straw <br />None <br />Gypsum <br />Sulfur <br />0 <br />227 <br />47 <br />Dry matter yield <br />No topsoil Two inches topsoil <br />pounds /acre <br />63 605 <br />316 921 <br />62 930 <br />1283 <br />746 <br />1587 <br />Identical experiments were initiated in 1973 at <br />four mine sites (Merrill et al., 1983b) in which each of <br />two topsoil applications (none or 12 inches) was <br />combined with each of two gypsum treatments <br />(none or 10 tons per acre). On topsoil treatments, <br />gypsum was incorporated into the spoil prior to ap- <br />plication of topsoil. Crested wheatgrass was seeded <br />on all except selected plots which were summerfal- <br />lowed for three years before seeding. The purpose of <br />summerfallowing was to increase moisture content <br />in the soil and spoil and promote the downward <br />leaching of sodium displaced by calcium from ap- <br />plied gypsum. Summerfallowing proved ineffective <br />in increasing gypsum effectiveness. Average yields <br />5 <br />`or the four -year period 1975 -78 and yields for 1983 <br />are given in Table 2. At the highly sodic Zap site, <br />average yields from 1975 to 1978 without topsoil <br />were Tess than half of yields when topsoil was ap- <br />plied. Gypsum had little effect on yields at Zap on <br />either the no topsoil or topsoiled treatments. On the <br />moderately sodic Beulah and Stanton sites, gypsum <br />did not affect yields on the topsoil plots in the <br />1975 -78 period; however, when gypsum was applied <br />to the plots which were not topsoiled, yields ap- <br />proached those on the topsoiled plots. On the non - <br />sodic Center site, average yields from 1975 -78 were <br />not affected by gypsum, but yields tended to be <br />higher when topsoil was applied. In 1983, yields at <br />each location were much lower than yields for the <br />1975 -78 period, partly because of climatic and stand <br />differences and partly because nitrogen fertilizer <br />was not applied after 1978. No consistent yield dif- <br />ferences due to gypsum were apparent in 1983 at any <br />site except possibly at Stanton. However, 1983 <br />yields obtained 10 years after topsoil was applied <br />tended to be two or three times as large as when no <br />topsoil was applied. These results emphasize the <br />need for respreading topsoil, since neither stands or <br />yields were maintained when only gypsum was ap- <br />plied. <br />Table 2. Average crested wheatgrass yields from 1975.78 and yields for 1983 <br />at four mines as affected by topsoil and gypsum. <br />SAR <br />of <br />Mine Spoil <br />Center <br />Beulah <br />Stanton <br />Zap <br />1 1975 -78 <br />1983 <br />11 1975 -78 <br />1983 <br />12 1975 -78 <br />1983 <br />27 1975 -78 <br />1983 <br />Average <br />No topsoil Topsoil' relative <br />No No yield <br />Year Gypsum Gypsum' Gypsum Gypsum' w/o topsoil <br />1.6 <br />04 <br />09 <br />03 <br />09 <br />0.1 <br />0.4 <br />1.3 <br />0.2 <br />1.1 <br />0.3 <br />1.1 <br />0.2 <br />0.3 <br />tons /acre <br />1.7 <br />07 <br />11 <br />0.6 <br />11 <br />05 <br />07 <br />0.6 <br />1.8 <br />0.8 <br />1.1 <br />0.6 <br />1.2 <br />0.7 <br />08 <br />0.8 <br />'12 inches of topsoil applied <br />10 tons per acre of gypsum applied to spoil before topsoiling <br />no yields obtained due to loss of stand <br />84 <br />37 <br />90 <br />55 <br />84 <br />27 <br />47 <br />These initial experiments demonstrated that top- <br />soil depths needed for optimum yields would be <br />related to the quality of the underlying spoil, with <br />greater depths of good quality soil needed to restore <br />productivity on poor quality spoil. This is illustrated <br />by results given in Figure 1 from treatments without <br />gypsum as reported by Merrill et al. (1981). On ade- <br />quately fertilized plots on nonsodic spoil, yields <br />were 8 percent higher on topsoiied plots than on <br />nontopsoiled plots, 29 percent higher on moderately <br />sodic spoil and 84 percent higher on highly sodic <br />spoil. The lower yields obtained with topsoil as the <br />sodicity level in the spoils increased indicated that <br />12 inches of topsoil was not enough to restore op- <br />timum productivity. <br />Doering and Willis (1975) conducted a laboratory <br />and field study of chemical reclamation for highly <br />sodic strip -mine spoil (SAR 25) using gypsum and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.