Laserfiche WebLink
Yield increase <br />due to topsoil ( %) 8 <br />1.5- <br />m 1.0- <br />1 <br />c <br />c 0.5- <br />0 <br />(] no topsoil topsoil <br />25 33 84 <br />11 12 27 <br />SAR of Spoil <br />Figure 1. Yields of crested wheatgrass with and without 12 <br />inches of topsoil at four sites with different SAR values <br />(Merrill et al., 1981). <br />calcium chloride. Gypsum, because of its low <br />solubility, was not an effective reclamation agent. <br />Calcium chloride (0.25 Molar) was sufficiently solu- <br />ble to increase the hydraulic conductivity of the <br />spoil so that the replaced sodium was leached down- <br />ward. Their results indicated that chemical reclama- <br />tion of sodic spoils was feasible but not practical <br />due to the high cost of calcium chloride. Their <br />results and the results of other North Dakota ex- <br />periments led Merrill et al. (1981) to conclude that <br />the use of chemical amendments was feasible only <br />when an adequate supply of suitable plant growth <br />material is not available. <br />TOPSOIL DEPTH EXPERIMENTS <br />Since the earlier experiments indicated that 1 foot <br />of soil replacement was inadequate to restore <br />premine productivity, further research was con- <br />ducted to compare the effects of different soil <br />depths. <br />Yield and Establishment of Forage Grasses: <br />The first experiment in North Dakota comparing <br />different depths of topsoil was initiated in 1972 at <br />Stanton (Ries et al., 1978). The spoil at this site was <br />highly dispersed (SAR 25) and moderately high in <br />clay (silty clay loam). Topsoil was applied at depths <br />of 0, 2, 6, and 12 inches. Two fertilizer treatments <br />were applied at each topsoil depth - no fertilizer or <br />fertilized with 100 pounds per acre of phosphate in- <br />itially (and none thereafter) plus 50 pounds per acre <br />of nitrogen each year for the first three years (and <br />none thereafter). The experiment was conducted for <br />nine years, but yields were obtained only the first <br />three and the last two years. Yield trends for crested <br />wheatgrass and native grasses were similar, so only <br />crested wheatgrass yields are given (Table 3). <br />6 <br />Table 3. Yields of crested wheatgrass in selected years from <br />1974 to 1982 with (w) and without (wlo) fertilizer as affected by <br />topsoil depth (Ries, et al., 1978 and unpublished USDA/ARS <br />data). <br />Yield <br />Topsoil 1974 1975 1976 1981 1982 <br />depth w wlo w wlo w w/o w wlo w w/o <br />inches <br />0 <br />2 <br />6 <br />12 <br />0 0 <br />1.8 0.4 <br />1.7 0.6 <br />2.0 1.1 <br />-- 0.1 <br />1.1 0.6 0.6 <br />1.2 0.8 0.7 <br />1.7 1.3 0.8 <br />tons /acre <br />0 0.1 <br />0.4 0.4 <br />0.4 0.5 <br />0.7 0.6 <br />0 <br />0.3 <br />0.4 <br />0.6 <br />0 <br />0.7 <br />0.8 <br />1.0 <br />0 <br />0.4 <br />0.6 <br />0.9 <br />Each year, yields were higher when 12 inches of <br />topsoil was applied, but the rate of yield increase in- <br />dicates that maximum yields were not attained at the <br />12 -inch depth even with adequate fertilization. The <br />application of fertilizer increased yields at each top- <br />soil depth every year. The persistence of this in- <br />crease through the ninth year suggests that part of <br />this fertilizer increase was due to phosphorus ap- <br />plication, but the relatively greater increases in the <br />first three years indicate that yields were also in- <br />creased by nitrogen fertilizer. The relative response <br />to fertilizer decreased as the depth of topsoil was in- <br />creased; this decrease can be attributed to the <br />available nutrient content of the replaced topsoil. <br />These results also suggest that the optimum depth <br />of soil replacement is not reduced by fertilization. <br />The effect of topsoil thickness on stand establish- <br />ment (plants per unit area, not yield) was measured <br />in 1974 and 1976, two and four years after crested <br />wheatgrass was seeded. When no topsoil was ap- <br />plied, stands were much lower than when topsoil <br />was applied (Figure 2), but stands did not increase as <br />the depth of soil increased. Since these measure- <br />ments were made in 1974 and 1976, they do not <br />reflect any long -term effects of topsoil thickness <br />upon stand retention. Stands were subsequently <br />observed to decline even further on plots to which <br />no topsoil was applied. <br />80 - <br />60 - <br />40 - <br />20 <br />0 <br />0 2 6 <br />12 <br />Topsoil depth (Inches) <br />Figure 2. Effect of topsoil depth over sodic minespoil on <br />stand density of crested wheatgrass (Ries et al., 1978). <br />