Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br />Commercial mining of lignite in North Dakota <br />began to increase in the early 1960s in response to <br />the increased demand for energy and the declining <br />supply and increased costs of other sources of <br />fossil fuels. The Fort Union formation, located in <br />Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming, <br />has been estimated to contain more than 40 percent <br />of the total United States coal reserves. Much of <br />western North Dakota, more than 28,000 square <br />miles, is underlain by lignite. Strippable lignite <br />reserve estimates refer to coal seams 5 feet or <br />thicker overlain by 100 feet or less of overburden. <br />Strippable reserves in western North Dakota are <br />estimated to underlie as much as 2 million acres. A <br />general discussion of North Dakota lignite reserves <br />and development potential has been given by <br />Dalsted and Leistritz (1974). <br />Public concem about the degradation of land by <br />strip- mining increased concurrently with increases <br />in production. Beginning in 1970, North Dakota pass- <br />ed legislation requiring reclamation of strip -mined <br />lands. The state reclamation laws were strengthened <br />by each succeeding legislative assembly until the <br />current 1979 North Dakota law was passed to bring <br />the state into compliance with the 1977 Federal <br />Stripmining Act. The 1979 law requires that strip - <br />mined lands be restored to productive levels which <br />are equal or better than before mining. <br />Initial attempts to revegetate leveled spoils were <br />generally successful only on nonsodic spoils (Power <br />et al., 1974). This led to experiments on highly sodic <br />spoils in which various chemical treatments, <br />mulches and topsoil replacement were compared. It <br />soon became apparent that even 2 inches of topsoil <br />markedly increased vegetative establishment and <br />dry matter production. These experiments showed <br />that reclamation success would be directly related <br />to chemical and physical characteristics of the <br />underlying spoil materials and the amount and quali- <br />ty of soil materials available for replacement. Further <br />studies were initiated to 1) characterize overburden <br />materials in the potential stripmining areas of North <br />Dakota, 2) evaluate soil materials available for use in <br />reclamation, and 3) develop reclamation technology <br />to assist in meeting legal requirements for land <br />restoration. The purpose of this review is to evaluate <br />published and unpublished North Dakota research <br />relating to the depth and quality of topsoil and sub- <br />soil (first and second lift) needed for successful <br />reclamation of North Dakota strip -mined lands and <br />to identify areas where further research may be <br />needed. <br />OVERBURDEN CHARACTERISTICS <br />Most of the lignite reserves in North Dakota are <br />located in the Bullion Creek and Sentinel Butte for- <br />mations of the Fort Union Group and consist of alter- <br />4 <br />nating layers of lignite, soft shales, silts and some <br />sands (Sandoval et al., 1973). Soils in the area are <br />derived from these Fort Union geologic materials, <br />from overlying glacial till or from alluvial or aeolian <br />deposits. <br />Studies of the characteristics of the lignite strip - <br />mine spoils in North Dakota as related to reclama- <br />tion potential have been reported by Gee et al. (1978); <br />Sandoval et al. (1973); Schroer (1976 and 1978) and in <br />ARS -NDSU Progress Report 20 (1975) and the suc- <br />ceeding Update (1977) and Supplement to the 1977 <br />Update (1979). No attempt will be made in this <br />discussion to summarize all the results of these <br />studies; instead, the variability in the properties of <br />these spoil materials which relate to soil replace- <br />ment depths will be emphasized. <br />Schroer (1976 and 1978) analyzed several hundred <br />overburden samples for various physical and <br />chemical properties and noted that these properties <br />varied widely with depth both within and between <br />mine areas. Because of this wide variation, he stated <br />that site sampling will be needed at each mine or <br />permit location to assess pertinent properties so <br />that the appropriate reclamation procedure can be <br />developed. He also sampled and analyzed reshaped <br />spoils at four mine sites and noted that the resulting <br />properties of the reshaped spoils could have been <br />predicted from pre -mine overburden sampling. <br />Sandoval et al. (1973) reported that minespoils <br />derived from the Fort Union geologic materials are <br />frequently fine - textured, with clay contents as high <br />as 40 percent. Smectite is the predominate clay <br />mineral, with appreciable quantities of vermiculite <br />and illite, with traces or low amounts of chlorite and <br />kaolinite (Bauer et al., 1976; Klages and Hopper, <br />1982). Sandoval et al. (1973) and Schroer (1976 and <br />1978) reported that these overburden materials tend <br />to be nonsaline to moderately saline (EC below 8) but <br />are often sodic (SAR above 20). However, the sodium <br />content is variable with SAR values varying from 2 to <br />70. In some areas, the Fort Union stratified materials <br />are overlain by glacial drift and /or aeolian materials. <br />These materials are generally low in soluble salts <br />and sodium but are occasionally coarse - textured <br />with a low water - holding capacity. <br />When the sodium content increases in a clay high <br />in expanding - lattice clay minerals (such as <br />smectite), the particles disperse, the surface <br />becomes sealed, and water intake may be reduced to <br />nearly zero. Gee et al. (1976) reported that when top- <br />soil was spread over sodic spoil and excess water <br />was applied, the moisture content of the topsoil was <br />still above field capacity after 30 days. <br />The results cited above and those to be discussed <br />later show the importance of spoil properties In <br />determining the optimum depth of topsoil and sub- <br />soil to be replaced. The most important spoil proper- <br />ties are sodium content, salinity, clay content and <br />