My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-03-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010088 (19)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2012-03-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010088 (19)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:54:49 PM
Creation date
3/8/2012 12:57:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/7/2012
Doc Name
Wildlife Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.1.2.3 Kit Fox, Red Fox, Coyote, and Raccoon: Kit fox are not likely to occur in the project <br />area due to the lack of suitable habitat and competition with coyote and red fox. The project is <br />not likely to affect coyote, red fox and raccoon since the primary habitat along Reed Wash will <br />not be affected. Habitat for den sites occurs along the banks of Reed Wash and the two terraces <br />above the wash. <br />4.1.3 Small Mammals <br />4.1.3.1 Rodents and Lagomorphs: Populations of these species may be affected within the <br />project site in the area of disturbance and not likely affected outside the project area. Impacts to <br />local populations would be expected to be minor. These species are the most abundant wildlife <br />families in the project area. Reproduction can occur throughout the year for some rodent species <br />such as mice; however, the spring and summer months are typically when higher levels of <br />reproduction take place. <br />4.2 BIRDS <br />4.2.1 Passerine Species: Surveys indicate that the greasewood habitat within the project area <br />is occupied by nesting birds. Approximately 5 -6 acres of greasewood habitat, potentially <br />suitable for foraging, nesting habitat and cover, would become unavailable during the life of the <br />project. Breeding bird surveys indicate that habitat capable of supporting 1.3 Lark Sparrow nests <br />and 0.13 Vesper Sparrow nests would be effected by the rail spru alignment. Both species are <br />common in westcentral Colorado and throughtout Mesa County. <br />Potential breeding bird diversity is higher in the riparian and wetland environment (12 species) <br />than in the greasewood shrublands (3 species). However, the biological survey does not indicate <br />a large or diverse nesting population of birds along Reed Wash. Twelve active or potential nest <br />sites composed of 10 species were found along Reed Wash and in the Loma Drain wetland. The <br />overstory vegetation is dominated by tamarisk, which is not high quality nesting habitat, since it <br />is a non - native plant species. <br />Some bird species nesting in project area may be affected due to disturbance by the presence and <br />use of the rail spur. It is suspected, that an unknown portion of the species will habituate to new <br />disturbance and continue to occupy suitable habitat. During the biological surveys, passerine <br />bird species were observed regularly foraging in the habitat adjacent to both sides of the existing <br />Union Pacific railroad. Species, such as the nesting Cliff Swallows, are successfully nesting <br />under an active highway bridge (Highway 6 &50) that is within approximately 100 ft of the <br />Union Pacific railroad. <br />Land clearing during the breeding season (April through mid -July) would disrupt the courting, <br />territory establishment or nesting activities of migratory birds and would likely result in direct <br />mortality of some birds, particularly early in the nesting season when young are not yet fledged <br />and capable of sustained flight. While there would likely be a small reduction in nesting at the <br />local project site scale, displaced birds would relocate to adjacent suitable habitat sites. It is <br />likely that the proposed action would have no measurable influence on the abundance or <br />distribution of migratory birds in the Reed Wash area. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.