My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-28_PERMIT FILE - C1991078A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1991078A
>
2011-02-28_PERMIT FILE - C1991078A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:15 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 11:06:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1991078A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/28/2011
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.05.6(3) Protection of the Hydrological Balance <br />(a)(i) The surface water from precipitation events <br />caithin the disturbed areas will be coursed to sedimentation ponds <br />for s minimum of 24 hours detention. The water discharged from <br />these sedimentation ponds will meet the effluent standards for <br />discharge through the use of valved dewatering pipes that will be <br />opened after settlement of the suspended solids. <br />Surface water from the mining operation is <br />not expected to degrade the surface water systems in the area. <br />The only possible degradation would be of Naturita Creek between <br />Broad Canyon upstream and the San Miguel River downstream. <br />Surface water from the mining operation <br />should not degrade the quality of water in the San Miguel River. <br />Bruce Zander with the EPA performed a DFLOW analysis for the USGS <br />station on the San Miguel River at Naturita. The 30 day, 3 year <br />low flow was 20.2 cfs for the data period 1918 - 1981. The 1 <br />day, 3 year low flow for the same period of record was 6.0 cfs. <br />In any case, if any run-off from the mine were to reach the San <br />Miguel River, the dilution factor would mitigate any effect the <br />mine water could have on the river. A 100 gpm flow from the mine <br />would have a 26.93 dilution factor using the 1 day, 3 year low <br />flow and the dilution factor would increase to 90.66 for the 30 <br />day, 3 year low flow. The San Miguel River is not expected to <br />receive any run-off from the mine site. The 100 gpm flow was <br />used to demonstrate the order of magnitude of a dilution factor. <br />• The one aquifer within the permit area is <br />about 20 feet thick and lies 90 to 100 feet below the last mine- <br />able coal seam. Analysis of drilling logs indicate several <br />strata of impermeable shales between the aquifer and the lowest <br />coal seam to be mined, totaling approximately 20 feet in thick- <br />ness. This impervious stratum should eliminate any effects on <br />the aquifer from the mining operation. <br />The aquifer discharges at various springs <br />adjacent to the permit area. Since the mining operation is not <br />expected to impact the aquifer, then it should not impact the <br />area springs. <br />lii) As explained above, the mining operation is <br />not expected to adversely affect the ground water or surface <br />water systems within or adjacent to the permit area. The rights <br />of present users of the surface and ground water, if any, should <br />therefore not be affected. <br />• 2.05-33 May 1991 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.