Laserfiche WebLink
Stage 3B: <br />1. I've enclosed the lease with Mesa County for the pump facility. The entire <br />area is fenced, with base gravel applied. There is no planting needed within <br />their easement. <br />General: <br />If you have additional questions or would like to discuss this response please call me. <br />Sincerely <br />1. We agree with your statement regarding responsibility of maintenance and <br />upkeep of the improvements. However, Whitewater is simply trying to say <br />that the land owners of Stage 2A and Stage 2B have plans for the use of their <br />property. And when they do, what they feel, are improvements that are not <br />part of our approved Reclamation Plan, then Whitewater does not want to take <br />on responsibility for installation, success, and/or repair of the landowner <br />improvements. Whitewater had completed grading and seeding of these areas <br />in accordance with our reclamation plan prior to the landowner's changes. The <br />Technical Revision filed, included the landowner improvements "as is" and <br />did not mention construction or determination of adequacy of those <br />improvements, only that they exist on the permit area. <br />If the Division requires Whitewater to take on these responsibilities, <br />Whitewater will withdraw its TR and write the landowners asking them to <br />remove their improvements so Whitewater can complete the existing <br />reclamation plan. <br />Mark Gardner,'VP <br />Whitewater Building Materials Corp. <br />