Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />1 1 from that? <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />26 <br />2 MR. BERRY: I believe that that is the <br />3 case, yes. <br />4 MR. JAVERNICK: With the issues that <br />5 they have jurisdiction over. <br />6 MR. BERRY: That's right. The citizen's <br />7 complaint is a very formal process, and we may receive <br />8 what's known as a 10 -day notice. I'm not sure if we <br />9 will or won't in this case, but that's a process by <br />10 which we are compelled to respond to the OSM, and they <br />11 are compelled to either agree or disagree with our <br />12 position. So yes, I believe there is a forum now for <br />13 either agreement or disagreement. <br />14 MS. LINDEN: I will just comment, <br />15 although I have not been extensively involved in this <br />16 matter, in fact, Dave and I just talked yesterday, I do <br />17 want to reiterate that the division in its discretion <br />18 took on reclamation and completed it in 1994 with the <br />19 funds it did have available it to, and Dave feels that <br />20 they have met the statutory requirement at that stage. <br />21 So the road project and the erosion project were in <br />22 addition to that, and they were just doing this as a <br />23 discretionary matter of getting severance tax at the <br />24 site. <br />25 MR. STARNER: Well, it's a discussion <br />