My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981037
>
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2021 8:06:54 PM
Creation date
11/29/2011 8:20:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
5/24/2000
Doc Name
MLRB Transcript
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />25 <br />1 GEC is certainly one of those sites <br />2 where there are minor off -site impacts and there are <br />3 significant on -site problems. Nobody questions that, <br />4 but legally we believe we've done everything that we <br />5 are required to do, and I suspect -- I don't know. I <br />6 can't speak for these guys, but I have a feeling that <br />7 we're not going to be in the same oversight battle that <br />8 we were years ago. <br />9 MR. CATTANY: I guess all I would say is <br />10 that whatever action we ultimately agree to that I <br />11 would like to see some sort of concurrence with OSM. <br />12 If it's no more action at the site or whatever, that <br />13 there's concurrence between the state agency and the <br />14 federal agency so that the owner isn't getting mixed <br />15 signals. <br />16 I think the other thing that I would say <br />17 is that if the allegations are true about the comments <br />18 of one of our employees about Mr. Adams, those are <br />19 inappropriate. The department has had a very good <br />20 relationship with John Adams through the years on a <br />21 number of issues, and if those statements were made, I <br />22 feel bad about that because they were inappropriate. <br />23 MR. JAVERNICK: Won't the resolution of <br />24 the citizen's complaint bring us to a point where we <br />25 either are both in agreement and we can move forward <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.