2011-11-07_PERMIT FILE - M2011033

• Permit No: M2011033
• IBM Index Class Name: PERMIT FILE
• Doc Date: 11/7/2011
• Doc Name: Response to Adequacy Review Letter October 4, 2011.
• From: RPM, Inc.
• To: DRMS
• Email Name: PSH
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

RPM, Inc.
Exhibit A — Legal Description (Rule 6.3.1)
4. Please revise the legal description to correspond the permitted acres (3.84) indicated on
the application form. The description shall be by township, range, and section, to at least the
nearest quarter - quarter section. A metes and bounds survey description is also acceptable.
Exhibit A has been revised as requested and the revision was submitted as part of the packet of
materials filed with the DRMS on October 5, 2011
Exhibit B — Site Description (Rule 6.3.2)
5. The Applicant states two permanent man -made structures are within 200 feet of the
affected boundary, however only one structure (the CDOT right of way fence) is identified.
Please explain this discrepancy and revise the exhibit accordingly.
The only other structure besides the CDOT right of way fence is the fence which is part of the
Corkle Construction mining operation.
6. The Applicant states storm water will be contained within the pit area and drain on to the
adjacent Corkle Construction permitted mine site where it is dealt with under the provision of its
permits. Please verify the CDPHE storm water permit for the Corkle Pit, File No. M -1995 -023
has been revised to incorporate the additional acreage contained in the proposed reclamation
only permit site.
We are unaware of any Mined Land Reclamation Board regulation requiring the DRMS to
enforce other agencies rules and regulations. Rule 6.3.6, Exhibit F only requires an applicant to
list what other, "... permits, licenses and approvals which are held or will be sought..." .
According to the Colorado Water Quality Control Division Storm Water Fact sheet, industrial
activities (to include sand and gravel operations) are not required to obtain a storm water permit
or develop a storm water management plan if the affected area is 5 acres or less. (Partial copy
attached)
Exhibit C — Mining Plan (Rule 6.3.3)
7. Please update the dimensions of any significant site disturbance required by Rule
6.3.30to indicate the revised (3.84) permit acreage.
Exhibit C has been revised and was submitted as part of the package submitted October 5, 2011.
Exhibit D — Reclamation Plan (Rule 6.3.4)
8. The Applicant proposed a reclamation bond amount of $2000.00 per acre. The proposed
per acre amount is acceptable to the Division; however the total acreage amount must be
RPM, Inc., 9050 Old Tom Morris Cir., Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 Phone: [phone] FAX:[phone] Email: hlhumphries2 @comcast.net