Laserfiche WebLink
conveyor line includes that portion as it crosses WCR 28 and into Heintzelman, even <br />though the line is not graphically shown at that location on the map. <br />6.4.4 Exhibit D - Mining Plan <br />3. Please provide the Division with plan for inspecting the portion of the conveyor <br />route which crosses over Weld County Road 28. The plan should detail the visual <br />observations to be made during the inspections as well as the frequency of the <br />inspections. <br />Please refer to Item 4, below. <br />4. Please describe the measures to be taken to prevent material from overtopping the <br />conveyor system and falling onto Weld County Road 28. <br />Overtopping may occur, however, the failsafe for overtopping is the design pan <br />below the conveyor which will capture any spilled materials. The pan will be <br />inspected daily and the pan cleaned as needed. <br />5. The Amendment Application states that 1,413 ft. of the conveyor system lies within <br />the permit boundary of the Heintzelman site. Please clarify if this includes the length <br />of the conveyor system which lies within the original permit boundary for the <br />Heintzelman site or just within the amended permit boundary. <br />The 1,413± feet of conveyor line referenced is for the Amendment area alone, since <br />the nature and apx. location of the line within the existing Heintzelman permit <br />boundary was previously approved by OMLR. <br />6. The Applicant provided an estimate for dismantling the conveyor system which <br />includes a cost for removal of oil tank crossing trusses and stands. Exhibit C -3 does <br />not depict the conveyor system crossing over any oil tanks. Please clarify if the <br />conveyor system will cross over oil tanks. If the conveyor system will cross over oil <br />tanks, then the Applicant will need to submit a detailed design drawing of the oil <br />tank crossing. In addition, Exhibit C -3 will need to be revised to show the oil tank <br />Varra Companies, Inc. <br />M- 2009 -018 <br />Heintzelman Conveyor Amendment Correspondence of Friday 4 November 2011 <br />2 <br />