My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-09_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-09-09_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:17 PM
Creation date
9/12/2011 12:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/9/2011
Doc Name
Response to Fifth Adequacy Letter
From
R Squared, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Wallace H. Erickson <br />Response to August 19, 2011 Cazier Memorandum <br />September 9, 2011 <br />Page 6 <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 8. <br />Wildcat will correct this reference to Attachment 6.5.4. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 9. <br />Page 6, Bench Stability. DRMS commented on this in the May 25, 2011 Memorandum <br />from Tim Cazier to Wally Erickson. Neither the comment, nor the response from the <br />applicant has changed: the applicant states "Existing mine benches were created in the <br />early 1900's with no signs of failure or instability." Furthermore, it is stated that "the <br />angle of repose of the benches range from 30 to 35 degrees ... " and that "in the future <br />operating and reclaimed bench and waste rock slopes of 1.5 (H) to 1(V) will be used as <br />design criteria." The stated angle of repose (30 to 35 degrees) equates to 1.4H :1V to <br />1.711: 1V. Please note that the proposed design criteria (1.5H: 1V) is steeper than the <br />flatter angle of repose (1.7H:1V). Also, during the June 30, 2010 inspection, tension <br />cracks in the May Day 1 bench were observed by the two DRMS inspectors present, <br />who pointed out the fracture and discussed their concern with the Wildcat representative. <br />As such, DRMS believes there to be sufficient evidence of potential instability to <br />necessitate analyses to demonstrate otherwise. Therefore, DRMS requires the operator <br />to submit stability analyses to demonstrate that the proposed benches will be stable <br />under the proposed design criteria while loaded with the expected mining /construction <br />equipment. These analyses shall have appropriate materials test data to support <br />assumptions used for analysis, including, but not limited to: unit weight, cohesion, and <br />friction angle. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 9. <br />Wildcat has proposed an engineering and geotechnical analysis of the May Day <br />No. 1 bench at Page 4 of Attachment D -2 (Portal Collapse Repair Work Plan). <br />Wildcat will revise Exhibit 6.5 to add a third paragraph to the Bench Stability <br />section at Page 6, as follows: <br />In order to confirm the stability of the benches at May Day No. 2, May Day No. 3 and <br />the Idaho Affected Area, and to assess the need for any stabilization at these benches, <br />prior to performing any rock storage activities, Wildcat will implement a geotechnical <br />work plan consisting of performing a review of existing data, subsurface investigation, <br />laboratory testing, engineering analysis, conclusions regarding bench stability, rock <br />storage area stability, and design criteria recommendations. Specifically, Wildcat will <br />perform the following: <br />• Drill test borings to 20 to 40 feet or refusal at locations identified by an <br />engineer /geologist during a site visit. An engineer /geologist will log the <br />borings and obtain relatively undisturbed, bulk samples of the materials <br />DEN 97, 591, 785v2 9 -9 -11 <br />GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP • ATTORNEYS AT LAW • WWW.GTLAW.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.