My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-09_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-09-09_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:17 PM
Creation date
9/12/2011 12:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/9/2011
Doc Name
Response to Fifth Adequacy Letter
From
R Squared, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Wallace H. Erickson <br />Response to August 19, 2011 Cazier Memorandum <br />September 9, 2011 <br />Page 4 <br />Adequacy Issue No. 6. <br />Page 8, Augmentation Pond, second to last paragraph. The last line of this paragraph <br />references the work plan, Attachment D -5, Figure D -5 -1 for illustration of the <br />embankment slopes. Attachment D -5 is the Dry Stack Tailings Work Plan, Attachment <br />D -6 is the Augmentation Pond work plan. Furthermore, it is Figure D -2 in Attachment <br />D -6, not Figure D -1 that presents sections of the Augmentation Pond. Finally, there are <br />no embankment side slopes labeled in cross section A, and the downstream embankment <br />is cut off in the cross section. There is no horizontal scale provided from which to <br />estimate a side slope on the cross section. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 6. <br />Wildcat will correct the reference in the last line of the second to last paragraph <br />on Page 8 of Exhibit 6.5 to refer to Attachment D -6, Figure D -2. Wildcat is also <br />providing a corrected Attachment D -6, Figure D -2 labeling side slopes in cross section <br />A. See Attachment 3. There is no embankment. This is an incised pond. The <br />downgradient topography is natural. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 7. <br />Page 9, La Plata River Bridge. The first bullet references Attachment 6.5 -3 with respect <br />to the bridge. The "Geotechnical reconnaissance report" in Attachment 6.5 -3 does not <br />mention the bridge. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 7. <br />Wildcat will clarify its approach to demonstrating the stability of the La Plata <br />River Bridge, and any necessary upgrades to the bridge to achieve stability, by <br />modifying the bullets at Page 9 of Exhibit 6.5 under the La Plata River Bridge section as <br />follows: <br />• Based upon preliminary analysis, the La Plata River Bridge is currently <br />designed to support an AASHTO truck loading of 15 tons. (Attachment <br />6.5.6). <br />• The bridge is currently 36 feet long, 11 feet wide with four 12 "x12" beams. <br />(Attachment 6.5.6). The bridge supports are approximately 33 feet on center. <br />(Attachment 6.5.6). The bridge is capable of supporting an AASHTO truck <br />loading type H15 -44 which is 6,000 pounds on the front axle and 24,000 <br />pounds on the rear axle spaced 14 feet on center. (Attachment 6.5.6). <br />• In order to confirm the stability of the La Plata River Bridge in its current <br />configuration, and to assess the need for any improvements to further <br />DEN 97,591,785v2 9 -9 -11 <br />GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP • ATTORNEYS AT LAW • WWW.GTLAW.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.