My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-09_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2011-09-09_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:02 PM
Creation date
9/12/2011 11:04:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
9/9/2011
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review No. 2
From
DRMS
To
Western Fuels Association, Inc
Email Name
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C- 2010 -089 PAR No. 2 <br />New Horizon North Mine <br />9- Sep -2011 <br />Page 13 of 25 <br />2.05.3(3) — Mine facilities <br />1. Response accepted. <br />2. In the Fuel Storage section, please include the tanks used to store used oil for use in heating <br />the truck shop (if such a facility is proposed here, as is found at the NH2 Mine). <br />DRMS: The Division was unable to find the new text in the Fuel Storage section. Please <br />review and revise as appropriate. <br />3. Response accepted. <br />4. On Page 15 of Section 2.05.3(3), in the County Roads section, please add the phrase, "the <br />outside right -of -way of' immediately prior to "current public roads." <br />DRMS: The text does not appear to have been added, as requested. <br />5. The Division has several comments regarding Map 2.05.3(3) -2 - Haul Road Alignment and <br />Details: <br />a), c), d),e), and f) Responses accepted. <br />b) The font used for Haul Road stationing in the plan and profile views is too small. <br />Please increase the font size. It may be preferable to show the stationing only at <br />increments of 500 feet, and use tick -marks for the intermediate 100 -foot stations. <br />DRMS: The stationing labels in the plan view are still too small to read. Please <br />increase the font size of the labels. <br />6. Response accepted. <br />2.05.3(4) — Ponds, impoundments, other treatment facilities and diversions <br />1. Response accepted. <br />2. Please provide documentation that the irrigation water users approve of the plan to relocate <br />the 2 Park Lateral irrigation ditch. Is this irrigation ditch the same as the Colorado <br />Cooperative Company's ditch? Please revise the permit text to make this clearer. Finally, <br />please provide a copy of the CCC Ditch Relocation Report that is missing from Appendix <br />2.05.3(3) -4. <br />DRMS: On page 6 of Section 2.05.3(4) of the May 26, 2011 response, Western Fuels <br />confirmed that the 2 Park Lateral ditch is the same as the Colorado Cooperative Company <br />ditch. Western Fuels also states that they are in the process of getting approval from the <br />ditch company for relocation of the irrigation ditch. Please provide a copy of the agreement <br />for insertion into the permit application. <br />3. As required under Rule 2.05.3(4)(a)(i)(B), Rule 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(A) and Rule 2.10(2), please <br />provide a statement certified by a registered professional engineer that the general and <br />detailed hydrology designs and maps were prepared by or under the direction of a registered <br />professional engineer. <br />DRMS: In the May 26, 2011 response, WFC stated that an engineer's certification was <br />located in the permit application just before the SEDCAD designs. However, the Division <br />cannot find this engineer's certification. Please point out exactly where this certification is <br />located. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.