My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-25_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-08-25_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:37:13 PM
Creation date
9/7/2011 3:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/25/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review No. 4
From
DRMS
To
CAM Colorado, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />CAM Colorado LLC <br />August 25, 2011 <br />Page 2 <br />In the August 19, 2011 submittal, CAM revised the permit text. However, please also <br />revise the water depletion estimate in Section 2.04.11 on pages 2.04 -37 and 38 to <br />include only the three proposed sediment ponds. <br />47.4 In the submittal dated April 12, 2011, the plan view drawings on Map 13 for ponds 1 and <br />2 were small and difficult to read. However, in the July 11, 2011 submittal, the plan view <br />drawings on Figure 13 (Map 13 ?) are too small to read. Please submit new plan view <br />drawings of each sediment pond, at a scale that is large enough to easily read the contour <br />lines, contour intervals and elevations. <br />Section 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(B) on permit pages 2.05 -19 and 2.05 -20 contains a description for <br />the construction of pond embankments with discharge structures. However, referring to <br />Map 13, revised in the August 19, 2011 submittal, it appears that ponds 1, 2 and 3 are <br />completely incised, with no constructed embankment and no discharge structures. If all <br />three ponds are completely incised with only pumped discharge, please revise Section <br />2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(B) to describe the construction of the three incised ponds. <br />47.6 Please add more detail to the discussion of pond reclamation in Section <br />2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(D) and, as was done for the topic of road reclamation, please add a <br />reference in Section 2.05.4(2)(c) on page 2.05 -30 that a general discussion of the <br />reclamation of the sediment ponds is presented in Section 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(D). <br />In the August 19, 2011 submittal, CAM added additional information on pages 2.05 -20, <br />21 and 31. However, the Division requests an expanded discussion concerning pond <br />reclamation, including where the fill will come from since the ponds will be incised, <br />compaction of the fill material and whether or not topsoil will be applied. <br />47.10 Please change "V- Ditch" to "Trapezoidal" and 0.5% slope to 8.0% slope for ditch <br />segment 3 -c in the Ditch and Culvert Design Summary on page Exh. 9 -2. <br />In the August 19, 2011 submittal, "V- Ditch" was changed to "Trapezoidal" for ditch 3 -c. <br />However, a slope of 0.8% is given for the ditch while the ditch design on page Exh. <br />9 -46 uses a slope of 8.0 %. Please reconcile this difference. <br />NEW ITEMS — Aueust 2011 <br />PAP Text <br />A. Page 2.05 -16 describes the Light Use Roads. In the second paragraph, "from" is misspelled <br />"form ", and I believe the road runs approximately 1,000 feet within the UP right -of -way. <br />Please have CAM correct these two items. <br />B. On page 2.05 -17, first paragraph, it might help clarify the intent to add the words, "from the <br />east" following "Reed Wash ". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.