Laserfiche WebLink
Corey Heaps <br />CAM Colorado LLC <br />August 25, 2011 Page 3 <br />C. On page 2.05 -30, the paragraph identifier (2)(c) should be shifted to the left margin. <br />D. On page 2.05 -31, the last paragraph states that reclaimed areas will be compacted to at least <br />95% of the MDD. For reclaimed areas, less compaction is probably better — the Division <br />suggests that 90 %, and +/- 4% of optimum moisture would suffice. <br />E. On page 2.05 -49, in the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph of (a): consider adding the phrase <br />"of the bridge and rail line is complete" after the word, "construction." <br />F. The Tavistock Right of Entry Agreement dated April 19, 2011 should be removed from <br />Exhibit 1. <br />G. In Exhibit 2, please clarify whether the Cultural Resource Survey Form for the Tavistock <br />parcel should be removed or retained in the PAP. <br />H. In Exhibit 7, the explanatory text for sample TLO -4 refers to the construction material <br />stockpile area. The intended verbiage would have been "borrow" rather than "stockpile ". <br />However, now that the Tavistock parcel has been removed from the application, perhaps the <br />wording here should be revised altogether. <br />I. In Exhibit 14, the AVF study, a revised Page 3 was provided under a previous response. The <br />wording on this page no longer appears to "flow" with that of pages 2 and 4. Please review, <br />and revise as appropriate. <br />PAP Maus <br />J. Map 02 Surface Ownership — Please add a property line delineating the boundary between <br />the Union Pacific right -of -way and parcels 01 and 04. <br />K. ,Map 03 Vegetation Map — The acreages listed in the Existing Vegetation Types table total <br />208.33 acres, and appear to be derived from an earlier version of the proposed permit <br />boundary. Please revise the vegetation acreages to reflect the current permit boundary <br />encompassing 215.6 acres. <br />L. Map 07 Pre/Post Mining Land Use -- The UP railroad mainline right -of -way, specifically that <br />within the permit boundary, appears to be classified as "Fish & Wildlife ". Should it possibly <br />be termed "Industrial ", instead? <br />M. Map 16 Loadout Facilities — Please remove the symbol for "Construction Material Borrow <br />Area" from the Legend, and label the Access Road. Should there be a culvert required <br />beneath Light Use Road #2 near where the road enters CAM's property? (Are there any <br />culverts beneath the railroad mainline in that vicinity?) <br />