My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-30_REVISION - M1981302 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
2011-06-30_REVISION - M1981302 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 4:42:09 PM
Creation date
8/22/2011 10:49:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/30/2011
Doc Name
As-Built Drawings of Perimeter Levee- Apps. B-1 to B-11, Part 2
From
The Regeants of the Univ. of Colorado
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR8
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Much of the geotechnical exploration program was focused on the evaluation <br />of the strength and consolidation characteristics of the levee. Gradation test <br />results for samples of the levee indicate it is well graded and very cobbly (rocky). <br />By excavating test pits T -1 through TP-3 with a -inch diameter auger, the <br />occurrence of larger diameter particles could be examined. The cobbles were <br />closely spaced and surrounded by a matrix of dense sand and stiff clay. It was very <br />difficult to pry the cobbles loose by hand. Test pit walls in the levee stood vertically <br />after excavation by the auger and showed no tendency to care. <br />Sand core density te t and nuclear gauge tests were conducted in the three <br />large diameter test pits. Holes for sand cone tests were difficult to excavate due to <br />the extensive cobbles. The pilot hole for the nuclear gauge tests had to be <br />advanced by driving ar pointed steel rod into the ground with a sledge hammer. <br />Results of field density tests are given in Table 11. Of the 15 compaction tests two <br />of which were in the foundation soils at the bottom of the fill), percent compaction <br />ranged from 75 to 103 percent. The wide range in percent compaction and <br />particularly the lower results are believed to be due to error caused by the cobbles <br />interfering with proper test conduct. Effort required to dig the sand cone holes and <br />drive the pilot hole for the nuclear gauge are evidence that the levee is well <br />compacted. <br />Based on field testing, observed characteristics of the levee and its <br />resistance to penetration, the levee is judged to be well compacted. Field <br />compaction tests were given less weight in this judgment because the levee fill is <br />practically untestable due to the concentration of large diameter particles. The <br />Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) considers a material as `rock fill" <br />and "not testable" if it contains 50 percent or more particles of 114 -inch size or <br />larger. Samples of the levee contained up to 45 percent retained on the No. 4 <br />sieve. cobble size particles were scalped from these gradation test samples. <br />Adjustment of the gradation tests to account for the cobble size particles would <br />indicate the samples are classified as "not testable ". Review r of Fig. I attached to <br />our August 22, 1997 later in Appendix B shows for an "unscalped" sample (none <br />FLATIRON COMPANIES <br />LEVEE AT DEERE FARM PIT <br />TUT 25,385 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.