My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-06_REVISION - M1981185 (62)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-06-06_REVISION - M1981185 (62)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:14 PM
Creation date
6/7/2011 8:30:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/6/2011
Doc Name
Response to CN-01 3rd addequacy issues for 112d-1 application part 1 attachment A thru D
From
R Squared Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Response to CN-01 Third Adequacy Issues - June 6, 2011 <br /> 1 inch = 1 inch = 1, <br />000 feet <br />[ 1 inch 1 inch = 1,000 feet <br />F 1 inch = 500 feet 1 inch = 833 feet <br />CC--88 1 inch= 500 feet 1 inch = 833 feet <br />SWMP-1 1 inch = 600 feet 1 inch = 923 feet <br />T5-1 1 inch = 600 feet 1 inch = 923 feet <br />D-1C 1 inch = 600 feet 1 inch = 923 feet <br />The nine maps listed in Table 1 are not acceptable as submitted. Please submit the full sized <br />maps or otherwise ensure such maps are of appropriate scale. Please ensure all maps of the <br />amended application for CN-01 are compliant with the general map requirements of Rule <br />6.2.1(2). <br />Response #4 <br />Wildcat Mining, is submitting revised mans which are compliant with Rule 6.2.1(2). Copies <br />of the revised maps are provided within Attachment C to this response <br />Adequacy Issue #5 <br />The details of Figure C-4, Total Operational Area, are not legible due to the inappropriate scale <br />(1 inch = 1,000 feet) resulting from reduction of the map. Figure C-4 fails to include all affected <br />lands within the permit boundary and boundary of affected lands. The color and pattern of line <br />used to delineate the affected land boundary and the permit boundary are sufficiently similar to <br />confuse the two boundaries. Figure C-4 labels two augmentation ponds, one of which appears to <br />be located outside the boundary of affected lands. Figure C-4 inappropriately locates the mill <br />facility at the Idaho rather than at the May Day 1 level. Figure C-4 identifies two areas labeled, <br />"Construction Lay Down Area," both of which appears to be located outside the boundary of <br />affected lands. Application documents indicate the Augmentation Pipeline Corridor is shown on <br />Figure C-4 (Attachment D, Exhibit A, Legal Description, page 3). However, there is no such <br />pipeline or corridor indicated on Figure C-4. Please submit a new Figure C-4, which corrects <br />these inadequacies. <br />Response #5 <br />Wildcat Mining, is submitting revised mans addressing these issues Wildcat Mining is <br />providing a larger map which is compliant with Rule 6.2. 1(2) Copies of the revised maps <br />are provided within Attachment C to this response <br />Revised <br />6/6/2011 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.