Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Preliminary and Secondary Issues April 28, 2011 <br />Engineering - Sheet 3 of 16 submitted with the conversion application. Please explain these <br />discrepancies and revise the application accordingly. <br />Response #16 Sakura Engineering road design has been withdrawn and replaced with CLC <br />Adequacy Response) <br />Question417 DRMS March 7`h 2011 Memo: File No M-1981-185 <br />In the Cuts, Fills, Retaining Walls and Reclamation section (Section 7) of the Access Repair & <br />Maintenance plan the Applicant states they will complete retaining wall(s) as designed <br />(Attachment F 2 - Sakura Engineering - Sheet S of 16 August 3, 2010). The Division did not <br />receive Sakura Engineering Drawings dated August 3, 2010. Please clam whether the <br />reference to August 3, 2010 is a typographic error or provide the Sakura drawing dated August <br />3, 2010. <br />Response #17 -Sakura Engineering road design has been withdrawn and replaced with CLC <br />Associated road and base of operation plans <br />Question-08 DRMS March 7rh, 2011 Memo: File No M-1981-185 <br />The Applicant references three adequacy review memos written by Allen Sorenson dated June S, <br />2009, August 2, 2009 and October 28, 2010. The Applicant has not answered all the questions <br />contained in the memos to the satisfaction of the Division. Copies of the memos are attached. <br />Please review and answer all of the memo questions and concerns. <br />Response #18 -Sakura Engineering road design has been withdrawn and replaced with CLC <br />4ssociated road and base of operation plans <br />Adequacy Issue #3- Geotechnical Stability Response to DRMS April 18, 2011 Comments <br />In Response #15, the Applicant states see Attachment E addressing Mr. Hays and Mr. Cazier's <br />issues. Due to the complexity and amount of information contained in Attachment E, the <br />Division requests the Applicant respond directly to the questions contained in the March 7th <br />memorandum by Mr. Hays and Mr. Cazier or specifically state where in the attachment the <br />response may be located. <br />Response #3- Geotechnical Stability Response to DRMS-April 18, 2011 Comments <br />A detailed work plan including a QA/QC program is presented in Attachment F CLC <br />Road DesiLyn Third Adequacy Response <br />Adequacy Issue #4-Geotechnical Stability Response to DRMS April 18, 2011 Comments <br />Response-Second and Third Geotechnical Issues 5 5/27/2011