Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Preliminary and Secondary Issues April 28, 2011 <br />ne3ponse FFll.- veswn specifications are presented in Attachment F CLC Road Design Thir, <br />Adequacy Response <br />Question-#12 DRMS March 7`11, 2011 Memo: File No M-1981-185 <br />The Applicant states, fill will be moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content. Please <br />provide a moisture conditioning range for the retaining wall fill. <br />Response#12. Design specifications are presented in Attachment F-CLC Road Design- Third <br />Adequacy Response. <br />Question-#13 DRMS March 7th, 2011 Memo: File No M-1981-185 <br />The Applicant states, fill will be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction per ASTM <br />D1557-02. The Division would require compaction to at least 95 percent utilizing ASTMD1557- <br />09. Please commit to the Division's requirements for fill compaction and revise Attachment 6.5- <br />2. <br />Response #13.- Design specifications are presented in Attachment F CLC Road Design Third <br />Adequacy Response and Revised Exhibit D (Attachment G Third Adequacy Response) <br />Question-04 DRMS March 7th, 2011 Memo: File No M-1981-185 <br />Please provide additional information and specifications for the proposed Hilfiker or Gabion <br />wall retaining structures, including typical drawings, for Division review. <br />Response #14. - Design specifications are presented in Attachment F CLC Road Design Third <br />4dequacv Response_ <br />Question-#15 DRMS March 71h, 2011 Memo: File No M-1981-185 <br />The Applicant mustprovide the Division with a detailed workplan, as requested in the previous <br />Geotechnical review memos, for the proposed retaining walls construction. The required work <br />plan must include a Quality Assurance/Quality Control program. <br />Response #15. - Sakura Engineering road design has been withdrawn and replaced with CLC <br />Associated road and base of operation plans (Attachment F CLC Road Design Third <br />Adeauarv Rncnn"cal <br />Question416 DRMS March 7th, 2011 Memo: File No M-1981-185 <br />In the Cuts, Fills, Retaining Walls and Reclamation section (Section 7) of the Access Repair & <br />Maintenance plan the Applicant states, road grades between 2+00 to 4+80 (Attachment- Sakura <br />Engineering - Sheet 3 of 16) are approximately 12% and in one section road grades are up to <br />18% This statement is not consistent with previous statements by the Applicant and Sakura <br />Response-Second and Third Geotechnical Issues 4 5/27/2011