Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Preliminary and Secondary Issues April 28, 2011 <br />In Response #15, the Applicant states a separate access road adequacy letter is being submitted <br />under separate cover. The Division received a letter entitled "Response to CN-01 Preliminary <br />Adequacy Issues for a 112d-1 Application, CN-0 1, Wildcat Mining Corporation, May Day Idaho <br />Mine Complex, File No. M-1985-185 Geotechnical Response" written by J. Erich Rauber. Please <br />confirm this is the letter referenced in Response # 15. <br />Response #4-Geotechnical Stability Response to DRMS-April 18, 2011 Comments <br />The letter prepared by J. Erich Rauber is the geotechnical response to a few of Mr. <br />Cazier's comments. <br />Adequacy Issue #5- Geotechnical Stability Response to DRMS April 18, 2011 Comments <br />In Response #26, the Applicant states Exhibit 6.5 provides the final configuration of the <br />reclaimed access road corridor. Exhibit 6.5 (Attachment E-8) did not discuss reclamation of the <br />access road. Please explain this discrepancy and provide the final configuration of the reclaimed <br />.road corridor. <br />Response #5- Geotechnical Stability Response to DRMS-April 18, 2011 Comments <br />Design specifications including reclamation are presented in Attachment F CLC Road <br />Design Third Adequacy Response Other reclamation activities are presented in Revised <br />Exhibit E (Attachment L-Third Adequacy Respone)Adequacy Issue #6 Geotechnical Stability Response to DRMS April 18, 2011 Comments <br />As mentioned in Question #4 above, the Applicant states this letter is an access road adequacy <br />letter response. The content of the letter discusses the requirements for Rule 6.5 and references <br />the engineering reports by Sakura and R Squared, but does not address the outstanding access <br />road adequacy issues or the outstanding adequacy questions for the Sakura and R Squared <br />reports. Please respond to the access road adequacy questions from the March 7, 2011 <br />memorandum and memos written by Allen Sorenson. <br />Response #6 <br />Design specifications including reclamation are presented in Attachment E and F CLC <br />Road Design- Third Adequacy Response The design prepared and by CLC Associates and <br />the submitted work plan addresses Mr. Allen Sorenson's memorandum and memos dating <br />back to 2008. The design has been P E stamped by CLC Engineering and the geotechnical <br />design has been stamped R Squared <br />Adequacy Issue #7- Geotechnical Stability Response to DRMS April 18, 2011 Comments <br />On page 2 in the New Access Road - road stability including cut slope section, the Applicant <br />states a geotechnical reconnaissance report as outlined in a May 29, 2010 memo (Attachment D) <br />are adopted by reference. Attachment D submitted in the most recent adequacy response (April <br />Response-Second and Third Geotechnical Issues 6 5/27/2011