My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-09_REVISION - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2010-12-09_REVISION - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:47 PM
Creation date
12/15/2010 1:05:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/9/2010
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
RN5
Email Name
SB1
SLB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Seneca Coal Company strips topsoil in single lifts once the woody vegetation which would <br />interfere with handling of the topsoil has been removed, pursuant to 4.06.2(1). As an <br />optional approach, SCC obtained approval to use a roto-clear machine that reduces large <br />woody vegetation to chips, so that the vegetative material could be incorporated with the <br />topsoil during salvage operations. This technique has been successfully employed at other <br />surface mines in the region, and was used in the aspen habitat within the Wolf Creek/Sage <br />Creek mining block in 2004. Topsoil was redistributed immediately on regraded areas <br />when possible or was stockpiled in designated storage areas pursuant to 4.06.1(2). The <br />amount stockpiled depended on pit advance, season of the year, and reclamation activities <br />taking place at the time of salvage. Stockpiled topsoil was placed in stable areas and <br />protected from wind and water erosion by planting of a quick-growing vegetative cover. <br />Single lift stripping mixes different soil horizons and thereby dilutes heavy clay <br />concentrations encountered in various subsoils. Although soil survey information and soil <br />handling plans contained in the PR-1 application were detailed and comprehensive, several <br />issues of concern were raised during the adequacy review. <br />The Division questioned what field characteristics would be used to define appropriate <br />salvage depths and requested justification for complete or partial salvage variances <br />proposed for a number of soil map units. SCC provided appropriate detail in regard to field <br />salvage depth determinations. Generally, in shale derived soils dominated by western <br />wheatgrass/alkali sagebrush vegetation, a 6 inch depth was salvaged. In sandstone, derived <br />soils dominated by mixed brush vegetation, salvage was terminated at the sandstone <br />bedrock contact or when a characteristic reddish brown clay subsoil was encountered. <br />In response to the salvage variance concerns, various tables, exhibits and text sections were <br />revised to indicate that all suitable topsoil would be salvaged and that no salvage variances <br />were being requested. The proposed soil replacement depth was changed from 1. l feet to <br />1.3 feet. Based on disturbed area modifications, updated soil balance calculations, and <br />reclamation plan changes made in association with PR-5, the approved average replacement <br />thickness in the original permit area is 1.3 feet, and average replacement thickness in the <br />South Extension area is 1.1 feet. Within designated aspen planting exclosures, approved <br />average replacement soil thickness is 4.0 feet; within upland shrub establishment areas <br />topsoiled in 2006, average replacement thickness is 0.6 feet. <br />Certain statements in Tab 21 indicate that topsoil in map units 101,103 and S 103 may be of <br />questionable suitability based on rock fragment content. Current information indicates that <br />topsoil in the subject map units is suitable and was salvaged. <br />Soil stabilization methods proposed by the operator consist primarily of minimal seed bed <br />preparation (resulting in a roughened soils surface) and use of either a straw mulch or a <br />quick growing annual grain cover crop on all topsoiled areas. Reclaimed areas will be <br />inspected annually by the operator as required by the proposed rill and gully maintenance <br />plan, and additional stabilization measures will be implemented if results of the annual <br />evaluation warrant such modifications. Graded spoils with excessive clay content as <br />Seneca II-W Findings Document 44 C1982057 <br />Permit Renewal No. 5 December 9, 2010
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.