My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-09_REVISION - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2010-12-09_REVISION - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:47 PM
Creation date
12/15/2010 1:05:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/9/2010
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
RN5
Email Name
SB1
SLB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SCC projects impacts from all spoil springs will increase TDS in Dry Creek from <br />1,048 mg/l to 2,451 mg/l. The TDS increase extends from Hubberson Gulch to the <br />Dry Creek reach monitored by Station WSD5 (upstream of the fields irrigated from <br />Temple Reservoir #1). At this point, the baseline TDS level in Dry Creek begins to <br />increase downstream. At a downstream location in Dry Creek, the TDS <br />concentrations are elevated enough (TDS = 3,567 mg/1) that the cumulative spoil <br />discharge influences from both mining areas (Seneca H-W and Seneca II-W South) <br />will be minimal. The source of the salt loading to Dry Creek is principally seepage <br />from dry land farming that extends from the hillslopes at the base of the mountains to <br />Hayden. Dry Creek water is mixed with water from the J.C. Temple Reservoir #1 for <br />irrigation in fields below this reservoir. The Division finds that there will be no <br />material damage to water in Dry Creek since the background TDS levels are higher <br />than the projected TDS levels from Hubberson Gulch. <br />IV. Topsoil <br />Soil resource information is provided in Tab 9, Volume 5 of the permit application. <br />Information on topsoil handling, maintenance and testing is contained in Tab 21, Volume <br />13. The PR-1 submittal extensively reorganized the soils sections of the application and <br />updated the soil baseline information to reflect 1990 survey of portions of the north mine <br />area which had not previously been surveyed. Baseline data had been collected for the <br />South Extension Area covered in PR-2, and in 1997 SCC conducted a topsoil depth <br />verification survey to confirm the topsoil resource information collected previously. This <br />information is also included in Tab 9. The referenced permit sections were further amended <br />to address the expanded disturbance area associated with PR-3. In PR-5, the Soil Survey <br />Map (Exhibit 9-3) was updated to reflect disturbance boundary modifications in the <br />southern Wolf Creek/Sage Creek block in the south extension area. Cessation of mining <br />operations earlier than originally anticipated resulted in a reduced area of disturbance in the <br />deep "70D" soil map unit. Associated updates were made to the Soil Replacement Map <br />(Exhibit 21-1) and topsoil balance narrative and tables in Tab 21. <br />The permit area is occupied by three soil orders; Mollisols, Entisols, and Aridisols. The <br />presence of these three orders is characteristic of the soils found in steep, semi-arid regions <br />of Northwestern Colorado. These orders represent soils that grade from recently developed <br />soils with minimum horizon development to more developed soils with well developed <br />diagnostic horizons. Specific soil types within these orders occur on predominantly three <br />types of parent material-land form combinations, namely: 1) upper side slopes, ridges, and <br />swales of sandstone residuum; 2) toe slopes, side slopes, rounded ridge tops of shale <br />residuum and colluvium; and 3) toe slopes, side slopes, ridges, and escarpments of <br />sandstone and shale. Among the 22 soil types occurring within the permit area, major <br />topsoil salvage limitations include clay textures, high coarse fragment content, steep slopes, <br />shallow bedrock, salinity, and alkalinity. <br />Seneca II-W Findings Document 43 C1982057 <br />Permit Renewal No. 5 December 9, 2010
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.