Laserfiche WebLink
f~ <br />part VIII of Appendix R). The archaeological site descriptions and reeommenda- <br />tions as recorded by Archeological Services are as Follows: <br />Site number 5MF945: <br />SW/NW/SW/SE Sec. 29-T6N-R91W (UTM: ikA, 13,277160 mE, 4480120 mN. ~kB, 13,277120 <br />mE, 4480100 mN. i1C, 13,277170 mE, 4480080 mN. ~kD, 13,277160 mE, 4480100 mN). A <br />lithic scatter with a concentration of primary and secondary flakes (suggesting a <br />possible tool manufacturing location), a grinding tool (mano) fragment, and sev- <br />eral fire cracked rack fragments were recorded. Evidence most likely indicates a <br />campsite of temporary nature. The site does not appear to be eligible for the <br />Rational Register. No further work is recommended. <br />Site number SMF946: <br />C/W-1/2/SE/SW/NW Sec. 34-T6N-R91W. (UTM: 4A, 13,279800 mE, 4479150 mN. #B, <br />13,279780 mE; 4479130 mN. ~C, 13,279800 mE, 4479120 mN. IkD, 13,279820 mE, <br />4479130 mN). A lithic scatter was found on a small sandstone outcropping above <br />an intermittent stream. Retouched flakes, one side-notched base, one obsidian <br />flake, and one corner-notched base were found within a concentration of <br />chalcedony flakes. This site was completely .surface collected, gridded and <br />shovel tested, at the instructions of the Principal Investigator. No further <br />work is recommended. <br />Site number SMF947: <br />SE/NE/SW/NW of Sec. 34-T6N-R91W. (UTM: 13,279900 mE, 4479200 mN). A lithic <br />scatter is located on a knoll between two minor streams, and adjacent to. a large <br />intermittent stream drainage. This site was completely surface collected, grid- <br />ded and shovel tested by order of the Principal Investigator. No further work is <br />recommended. <br />Site number SMF948: <br />SE/NE/NE/NE of Sec. 8-TSN-R90W. (UTM: 13,287080 mE, '4476100 mN). A pictograph <br />and petroglyph site is located on the sandstone wall of a cliff on the south side <br />of the' Williams Fork Mountains. The drainage culminates at the Williams Fork <br />River. Extensive color photographs were taken of this site in order to show the <br />contrast of red and yellow ocher. This site will be recommended to the National <br />Register. Avoidance is recommended. If construction activity comes within SO <br />fee[ of the site, the site should be fenced. Site SMF948 is located outside of <br />the proposed mine plan area, therefore no disLUrbance of this site is anCici- <br />pated. <br />~. `r~ 5S8' <br />2-590 ~iti <br />