My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2001-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2016 9:44:23 AM
Creation date
11/26/2010 3:36:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
pages 2-577 to 2-592
Section_Exhibit Name
2.8 Aquatic Communities & 2.9 Archaeologic, Cultural and Historical Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(SMF288) contained ar.tifacta and lithic (stone;) debris. These materials were <br />scattered in the vicinity of a natural spring which had been impounded as a stock <br />watering pond. A buried fire hearth was also found protruding from .a small <br />arroyo a short distance above the stock watering tanks. <br />The second recorded site (SMF290) consisted of a pictograph and possible camp- <br />site. This site contained a single pictograph, two possible awl sharpening <br />grooves, and burned rock under a sandstone overhang. <br />These sites did not consititu[e a significant archaeologi'ca1 resource. Breter- <br />nitz concluded that the mining operation per se "does not endanger any scientifi- <br />cally or culturally valuable anthropological localities," and recommended no fur- <br />[her investigation into these two sites. The location of these archaeological <br />sites were recorded with the University of Colorado Museum Archaeological Survey <br />and material collected in the field was deposited with this institution. <br />• This survey was accepted Eor compliance purposes by the Craig District Office- <br />Bureau of Land Management (see correspondence from C. Levitt, BLM to B. Diede- <br />rich, Utah International in Appendix K). <br />A survey of portions of Che proposed mine plan area by C. Arthur in 1977 did not <br />discover any archaeological sites (see Section 2.9.2 for results of a recorded <br />historic site, SMF348). <br />Williams (1977) recorded an archaeological site (MF475) with scattered waste <br />flakes and one projectile point. No further work was recommended for [he site. <br />The survey has been accepted by [he Craig District Bureau of Land Management <br />(refer to Appendix R). Moreover, the site is outside of the proposed. .mine plan <br />area. <br />During the summer of 1980, at the request of Utah International Inc.'s Trapper <br />Hine, Archeological Services of Laramie, Wyoming, conducted a Class III cultural <br />resource survey of Trapper Mines proposed mine plan area and adjacent areas that <br />. had not previously been surveyed. A total of five prehistoric sites, one his- <br />toric site (see Section 2.9.2), and eighteen isolated finds were recorded (see <br />2-589 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.