My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-10-25_INSPECTION - C1981041
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2010-10-25_INSPECTION - C1981041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:26:09 PM
Creation date
10/26/2010 4:26:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
10/25/2010
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
9/23/2010
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 23, 2010 C- 1981 -041 /Roadside Portals MPB <br />was redistributed at reclaimed UTL Ponds 1 and 2. Coal fines were scraped up and removed from the small area <br />outside the rail loop and from all areas inside the UTL rail loop where they had accumulated. Topsoil Stockpile <br />Number 4 has been fully utilized and the area was regraded. At the former topsoil stockpile location and small <br />area outside of the rail loop the regraded surface was scarified to relieve compaction and provide for root <br />penetration. Both of these locations are flat with very little potential for erosion. All of these disturbed non - active <br />use locations were vegetated utilizing the approved seed mixture by hydro seeding or broadcast seeding and <br />certified weed free mulch was then applied. <br />Although Halliburton had requested that the vegetation requirements of Rule 4.15.10(2) be waived due to ongoing <br />construction projects, these isolated areas described above were all successfully reseeded and mulched to further <br />stabilize the areas and protect against future erosion. See previous Photographs 9 and 10 for UTL Ponds 1 and 2, <br />respectively. The location of reclaimed Topsoil Stockpile Number 4 is shown in Photograph No. 15 and the small <br />non - active use area outside the rail loop is shown in Photograph No. 16. These photographs illustrate that the <br />areas have been adequately reclaimed and ground conditions remain stable. No evidence of rills, gullies, or sheet <br />wash erosion was observed at any of the non - active use areas and there were no noxious plants observed on the <br />reclaimed areas. <br />RECLAMATION SUCCESS - Rule 4.15, Rule 3: <br />Nothing was identified during this inspection that would preclude full bond release for the approximate 75.2 <br />reclaimed acres located between the U.S. Government Highline Canal and the Colorado River and lying north of I- <br />9/10 Road, which was formerly used by the Roadside Portals Mine for a Unit Train Loadout Facility, Permanent <br />Flood Control Dike, Railroad Spur and Overland Conveyor. All reclamation obligations have been completed <br />within the bond release request areas. The industrial /commercial post- mining land use is fully functioning and the <br />reclaimed land serves this purpose well. A summary of the reclamation success criteria used to evaluate the site is <br />given below. <br />Because of this site's industrial /commercial postmining land use, the requirements of Rule 4.15. 10 apply. Rule <br />4.15.10(2) requires the ground cover of living plants to be sufficient to control erosion for areas to be developed <br />for industrial use less than 2 years after regrading has been completed prior to releasing final bond. However, <br />Rule 4.15.10(3) allows the vegetation requirement to be waived for mine support facilities located within areas <br />where the pre- mining and approved post- mining land use is industrial if requested in writing by the landowner, <br />and if the Division determines that revegetation is not necessary to control erosion. By letter dated June 22, 2010, <br />Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., which holds the surface rights to the UTL and Conveyor corridor areas, <br />requested that the vegetation requirements of Rule 4.15.10(2) be waived due to ongoing construction projects. <br />Halliburton also noted that future vegetation and weed management will be regulated by Mesa County under a <br />current Conditional Use Permit. The revegetation success criteria of 4.15.10 would only apply to non - active use <br />areas where it would be appropriate to reestablish vegetation if necessary to control erosion. Because of the small <br />size, flat topography, and no signs of erosion or instability at the non - active use areas, DRMS determined that <br />revegetation was not necessary to control erosion in accordance with the standard set forth in Rule 4.15.10(3) in <br />these few isolated areas. However, prior to the bond release inspection, SCC, DRMS and Halliburton all agreed <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 2 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br />Page 6 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.