Laserfiche WebLink
soils would be removed from this place since 2009 and again they stole our soils and even. calling <br />Sandy Brown, it did not stop until I parked in front of the shovel and we called Lance and Ross <br />and it ceased after documented pictures and many stuck load s later. This was a guarantee to all <br />of us and you that they would steal no more and in 2010, they did it again. Prime Farmland <br />Rules and Regulations are very strict and we are not again going to lose what they have already <br />taken from us once. <br />As to the well, we had a well and Lance agreed to put it where ever we wanted it. As to the size <br />of the prime farmland, everyone is overlooking the facts that this was 140 acres minus 25 more <br />or less and that a ROAD was put through the center of our Prime Farmland and that the ROAD is <br />suppose to also be reclaimed to the prime farmland condition it was prior to the mine entering the <br />Property. This is also against the Rules and Regulations governing Prime Farmland as was the <br />Pond in the middle of our alfalfa. Field ?nhich should have never been allowed to happen. None <br />of our Prime Farmland should be less than what it was to begin with. <br />As to communications with Western Fuels or DBMS, since the lawsuit had to be fled, all <br />communication has ceased except for us trying to can and write and writing their attorney. <br />Another person put in the game that also does not understand prime farmland or faming. We try <br />continuously to get .PR-06 straightened out, but all calls or faxes have been ignored and no <br />changes as we have requested have been. resolved or completed. So all of these things marked <br />resolved , in fact, are not and none of what we have requested or asked to be corrected with <br />Western. Fuels help have been done. Greg Lewicki states that this is what we wanted, but <br />nothing even. close to what we asked for. <br />Thank you for your time, W. Berry. In 1.5 years, we were never sLllowed to be on a tour of the <br />mine with the state people and the mine or just the state people. All of you write and document <br />that it is because of the conflict between me and the mine. Lance cordially invited me and I was <br />unable to attend and did not see the need when, Michael was going. Lance dial not have a <br />problem with evert me. In 15 years, we have not been included in any discussions or decisions <br />concerning this property until I filed an obiection, with. DRMS..Michael nor Mr. Morgan was <br />never invited even prior to that time or informed as to what was really happening. i was ,leasing <br />the property and was never informed. Long before there were any problems. So, none of us even <br />today understated how these meetings can take place and we beg to go and we are refused, even <br />before the disputes worsened. <br />The 1992 letter of Dean Stindts was SITE Specific and there was No misunderstanding or <br />misinterpretation of this letter. All futwre expansion was sight specific and all ;future expansion <br />had to include land use and prime farmland evaluations and by you having there add your name <br />to this letter was misinterpreted by you also, just put the blame back on you. sure the information they are - DBMS jobi.s to <br />providing you, is correct and accurate and since Dean Stindt <br />talked to Western Fuels personally and explained to them the situation and since they were also <br />sued over prime familand, you are sure taking on a big jump here. <br />Attachment 2.05.4(2)(e)-11 'I'jus is not what we said and this is not what was decided. if <br />someone else is going to do the interpretations, them they should be accurate since they are saying