My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980001
>
2010-09-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:21:21 PM
Creation date
9/3/2010 8:27:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/2/2010
Doc Name
2010 Weed Mgmt Reports (emailed)
From
Chevron Mining Inc.
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Vegetation
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Herbicide solutions were spot-applied to targeted weed species with an RTV-mounted <br />spray rig in easily accessible areas and backpack sprayers on more difficult terrain. An <br />herbicide solution of Weedestroy (active ingredient: 2,4-D amine) and Tordon 22K <br />(active ingredient: picloram) was applied to Canada thistle, musk thistle, oxeye daisy and <br />houndstongue. These herbicides are broadleaf selective and have a very low potential for <br />injury to surrounding desirable native grass species. A separate mixture of Milestone <br />(aminopyralid) and Escort (metsulfuron methyl) was used to treat whitetop infestations. <br />These herbicides are less selective than the mix used for thistle and houndstongue species <br />and are frequently used to combat whitetop with a high degree of success. A surfactant, <br />MSO Premium, was included in both herbicide mixtures to increase leaf adhesion and <br />absorption. Additionally, blue marker dye was included in both mixtures to allow greater <br />visibility of treated areas. Appendix A contains complete herbicide application records <br />for 2010, including dates, quantities, and dilution rates of all herbicides and surfactants. <br />Noxious Weed Locations <br />Treatment efforts in 2010 were focused in both the Moffat and West Ridge areas of the <br />mine. A map summarizing treatment areas, dates, and species has been included in this <br />document as Appendix B. <br />Moffat <br />Large dense patches of Canada thistle were treated in the Moffat area over the course of <br />both visits in 2010. During the June visits, many Canada thistle plants were treated as <br />very small rosettes. Prior to the July visit, rosettes and unsprouted plants became larger, <br />allowing for greater visibility and ease of treatment. The majority had not gone to seed as <br />of the July treatment. The most severe infestations were found in the northwestern section <br />of the Moffat area, adjacent to the pond and extending eastward several hundred yards <br />into the bottom sections of the three drainages that bisect the northern portion of the <br />Moffat area. The pasture/sagebrush areas directly south of the pond within the Moffat <br />area were found to have the highest density of Canada thistle. Small patches of oxeye <br />daisy were treated along the drainage in this area as well. The open hillsides directly to <br />the east of this field, across the road, were also found to have high densities of Canada <br />thistle. <br />2010 Edna Mine Weed Management Report 2 8/30/2010
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.