My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-11_REVISION - M1977219
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977219
>
2010-08-11_REVISION - M1977219
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:48:34 PM
Creation date
8/11/2010 2:13:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977219
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/11/2010
Doc Name
Subnmittal
From
LJ Development for Summit Brick and Tile
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The operator has placed an earthen berm around the fuel storage area please see the tow (2) <br />photographs attached to this report showing the area in question. The containment is sized large <br />enough to hold 125 % of the fuel if spilled. All of the empty drums have been properly disposed <br />of and are no longer on site. <br />Resolution of the problems/possible violations and there corrective actions follow: <br />1.) There is a maximum of 1590 lineal feet and height of the highwall allowed on site presently <br />approved the operator proposes the following and the attached technical revision drawings sheets <br />1 of 6 to 6 of 6 for reference: <br />THE OPERATOR DESIRES TO MINE THIS SITE AS <br />A TOTAL UNIT WITH OUT ANY PHASING. THIS WILL AID IN THE SELECTION OF <br />PRODUCTS TO BE MINED AS THE MARKET DEMANDS. PRIOR PRACTICE TO <br />THIS TECHNICAL REVISION WAS TO MINE ONLY ONE COMMODITY AT A TIME. <br />THE PRESENT AND FUTURE ECONOMIC CLIMATE, THIS MINE WILL NEED TO <br />PRODUCE SEVERAL OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONCURRENTLY. <br />BY WAY OF THIS CHANGE IN OPERATIONAL STRATEGY, THE OPERATOR <br />WOULD REQUEST THAT THE HIGHWALL SITUATION BE MODIFIED AS WELL. A <br />NECESSARY PART OF THIS MINING OPERATION NECESSITATES HIGH WALLS <br />IN ORDER TO GET TO THE CLAY. A MINING OPERATION IN THIS TYPE OF <br />TERRAIN DICTATES THAT HIGHWALL BE BENCHED AND MINED TO A DEPTH <br />THAT ENABLES THE MINER TO RECOVER THE RESOURCE. HIGHWALLS AT <br />SOME AREAS MAY REACH HAS HIGH AS 45 FEET FROM THE TOE OF THE <br />HIGHWALL ASSUMING THAT THE HIGHWALL IS GEOLOGICALLY STABLE THE <br />OPERATOR BELIEVES THAT A MAXIMUM OF 45 FEET IN HEIGHT IS FEASIBLE. <br />ACCORDINGLY, THE OPERATOR WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE THE 1570 LINEAL <br />FEET OF HIGHWALL STATED IN THE ORIGINAL PERMIT TO A STATEMENT, <br />THAT REELECTS THE REALITY OF THE MINE CONDITIONS AND WHERE THE <br />RESOURCE IS IN THE STRATUM. SUCH AS" THAT THE HIGHWALL WILL NOT <br />EXCEED 45 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT, AND THAT THE COMPOSITION OF THE <br />ROCK MASS MAKING UP THE HIGHWALL IS DEEMED GEOLOGICALLY <br />STABLE". <br />THE TECHNICAL REVISION REQUESTED WILL ENABLE THE OPERATOR TO <br />PLAN THE POST MINING RECLAMATION IN A FASHION THAT WILL ENHANCE <br />THE AFFECTED LANDS AFTER MINING HAS CONCLUDE. ADDITIONALLY THE <br />MINER/OPERATOR WILL NOT HAVE TO UNNECESSARILY MOVE THUS CAUSING <br />LESS EROSION AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS THAT MOVING <br />STOCKPILES CREATES. <br />THE PROFILE OF THE HIGHWALL AFTER RECLAMATION EFFORTS WILL <br />REDUCE THE HIGHWALL. THE FINAL SHAPE WILL REFLECT A FACE OF THE <br />HIGHWALL RANGING BETWEEN 309 TO 359 FROM VERTICAL. THIS SLOPE WILL <br />BE GEOLOGICALLY STABLE AND WILL BLEND INTO THE LANDSCAPE OF THE <br />SURROUNDING AREA. <br />2.) THE OLD DRUMS HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE MINE SITE. PLEASE SEE PHOTOGRAPHS <br />ATTACHED.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.