My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-17_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-07-17_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:22 PM
Creation date
7/26/2010 9:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/17/2010
Doc Name
Objection Letter(Faxed)
From
Western Fuels Colorado
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Boyd present with us before a letter is written and put as record so that we ourselves know what <br />portions he agreed to because this stuff we are reading right now is ALL wrong! I know he did <br />not agree to this! <br />(27)WFC has already agreed to calculate water requirements per Morgans experience not NRCS. <br />NRCS does not want to be in charge of us nor does Jim want to tell us how to farm because he is <br />not a farmer. He provides data and staling figures that are very conservative and we are suppose <br />to have an idea of a beginning if we need help. <br />(28)The use of the types of equipment are wrong and again terminology and out of context usage. <br />Again, they are not farmers and do not know what theyare talking about. <br />(29)Do not limite4 us or yourselves to specific inches on soils or specific times of mpl.owing of <br />crops. When they are dropping off in production, mplow and replant. This may be the 3' years, <br />the 10t" years, the 5" year, do not state a specific year that changes ALL OF THE TIMEM Do <br />not put soil depth of27inebes or33 inches, If it is there, GIVE IT ALL; BACK TO USEW That is <br />,??was agreed by the State and WFC on tape. <br />(30)1 can, now prove beyond a doubt that WFC knew that ALL of this was primefarmland before <br />they ever stole our soil and put it on Bud Bensons. We all knew they knew for fact but to prove <br />it to all of you was the hard part. NOW I CAN IN WRITING and.1 can show they knew before <br />they ever took our soil. <br />(31)Put all documentation to be the truth and correct and the terminology to be true and correct <br />(32)How can corn be used in rotation. under a sideroll.. We do not want tritacale used on. our <br />place unless it is planted as a fall crop and plowed up as green manure in the spring BEFORE it <br />heads out. <br />(33)A11, of our irrigation was in place prior to the mine entering the property and we [planted <br />anything and everything, why should we have to accept less? <br />WFC is the one who said that the only improvements is landl.eveling, not me. I was telling you <br />that this was wrong and not correct. <br />(34)What does any of these additional comments that you always make have to do with getting a <br />permit revision. Throw out everything you have and stick to the basics of what is required of a <br />permit revision and cut it down to about 50 pages and go on. <br />(35)The DBMS did not make the negative prime farmland determination, you did when you put <br />NOT applicable in all your documentation. They are not familiar with the farmers or the area, <br />you were. You knew that everything was prime farmland from the time MEL Staats sued you <br />and you said then that there would not ever be any prime farmland on the place. We only know <br />what you tell us and you told us all of the time that the State requires these things, but in fact you <br />figured. out how to use the system and blind the state with lies about all of our properties and of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.