My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-17_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-07-17_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:22 PM
Creation date
7/26/2010 9:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/17/2010
Doc Name
Objection Letter(Faxed)
From
Western Fuels Colorado
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
right. We have to make our livings here, All of you live and are moving elsewhere and you get a <br />regular. $100,000 dollar a year, paycheck. We have to make what we raise provide for us and take <br />care of us the rest of our lives. <br />(22) Some of the things that WFC wants a response right away. Things aren't that easy. Marcia <br />wrote up a plan for our soils and with what there is now, it is a good plan, But, it is TAKE THIS <br />OR LEAVE IT and it shouldn't have to be. With what we have left after WF'C stole our Prune <br />soils, this is a forced situation. If our soils were still here, we would not be having this <br />discussion. I did not put us in the positions that we are in, you. did. We had plenty of prime soils <br />to redo our entire property as good or better than it was until WFC stole our soils. Now, the <br />State as well as WFC needs to develope a plan, to make what we have do. Our property will <br />never be as good as or better than it was and we are forced to accept a plan that shoukd of never <br />been,so again, it's take it or leave it. <br />(23) We fertilize EVERY YEAR and we will not accept any less than what we already do and <br />have done. WE PUT 400 POUNDS TO THE ACRE THIS YEAR AND THE REASON WE <br />HAVE ALWAYS HAD GOOD PRODUCTION IS BECAUSE WE HAVE ALWAYS <br />FERTILIZED GOOD. WE WILL NOT ALLOW FOR LESS THAN WHAT WE DO <br />OURSELVES. You have already stolen our topsoil and we will not depend on you to make <br />decisions to get our bond release when you know nothing about farming or what it needs. We do <br />it, and so will you, and it is critical to have the fertilizer so production can be made unlike what <br />you have done in the past I spent over 12000 dollars on fertilizer every year out of my own <br />pocket not counting the help from the HPP project and so will you!!!. If you are going to tryand <br />take short cuts after you stole our topsoil which you still need to pay Mr. And Mrs. Morgan for <br />that soil you stole, then get off this property because we will not accept any less than what we <br />had. <br />(24)We will. irrigate and manage the irrigation as we have always done and strive for perfection <br />and bond release. We would also like bond release in 5 years instead of 10 years becWe as the <br />laws state, we already EQUAL the 26 inches of rainfall that is required by law through irrigation <br />in ONE SEASON. <br />(25)How do we respond to some of these demands? The soil letter is accept or else and if the <br />mine quits mining today since they stole our soils, there isn't enough soil. to even put it back <br />without salvaging the rest. How is the farmer protected here and. how do we EVER have what <br />we had??? <br />We had our irrigation in place and we could grow anything, how do we do this again? <br />(26)Jim Boyds agreement to what ? We do not know what Ji.m. Boyd was given or shown and <br />with past experience, the things Jim Boyd may have been given or told isn't anything what they <br />appear to be. If we can';t be in these discussions with Jim Boyd when they are being made, then <br />we won't accept that either. We talked with jim Boyd and he is never given the same <br />information that we are given. The PR,?infor,nati.on is so mixed up and out of terminology and <br />context that we can't imagine that he agreed to how Ross is saying he agreed to. We want Jim
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.