Laserfiche WebLink
course, they had no reason not to believe everything you were telling them and it was not until. <br />2008 when I started my own investigations and rule reading that I caught you. 2005 is not an <br />acceptable date for anything, it was just when you finally got caught and now you are trying to <br />figure out how to get out ofwbat you have done and make it look like the DBMS actually was <br />the blame. People can only snake decisions on what facts they have in f.,rout of them. and if these <br />people believed you, then of course, wrong decisions and determinations would be made. You <br />owe Morgans compensation for the theft of their topsoil. Theft is theft,. <br />(36)WFC was obligated in 1948 to address the possibility of prime farmland and we will not <br />accept WF'C using 2008 as the time they found out. I can prove this is not true. <br />(37)I want to see the public notice that says you are going from a 2 lift operation to a 1 lift <br />operation. I want to see it in writing where we had the opportunity to file an objection? <br />(38)I want to see the Prime Farmland investigation report that was done to get a negative <br />determination. I want to read it for myself! <br />(39)If it is not an accurate statement. Just leave it out. Such as No mining or other disturbances. <br />If there is going to be even a minor disturbance, put that in there or just l;eave out that sentence. <br />(40)lf the other 3 books of PR611 are going to remain part of documentation , then we are <br />objecting to PR6 and again asking for the withdrawal of the entire document for false <br />information. <br />(41) The OSM interim is being challenged and is on hold at this minute to see the outcome of <br />PR6, but if false documentation is still a part of PR6, then we are requesting another hearing and <br />if we have to go to Denver, so be it. We are again. requesting the State to come in person and be <br />apart of this so that these things can be resolved. Without face *o, face time, this will never be <br />resolved. <br />(42)T.he OSM did, not review the history of the permit process. What they reviewed is what facts <br />that they thought to be facts that was given to them. and made a. decision based on those. The <br />facts were false. <br />(43) Alluvials were documented in the soil surveys and you know it. And I know you knew all <br />of the truths, and why you would fight so hard to make it so bad on everyone when it would have <br />been. much easier just to do you jobs and take your coal and put our place back like it was and go <br />on. That's all we ever wanted and you did that East of 2700 road, why couldn't you just do it <br />here? We want our place back as good or better than. it was and you cam set do that. Sure you <br />can go on with the soils and we can plant and grow crops, but it will never be as good as it was. <br />You know it and we know it. Again, it's take it or leave it and that is not what those rules, <br />regulations and laws were passed for. We were suppose to be protected from mining operations <br />like that. If we knew what we know now, I guarantee you that there would have never been a <br />lease. You have cost us more in production and the loss of our topsoil that was ever given for the <br />coal. You owe Mr. And Mrs. Morgan for the theft of their soils and you owe everyone an